It wasn't because it couldn't. Hari tried it and failed. Applying Psychohistory to only large enough populations was his compromise. This is mentioned in Prelude to Foundation. I think Hari specifically mentions how complex predicting weather is iirc. That's why I mentioned it in the first place.
That would've been the case in early times. Now everything is computer controlled. So redundancy should be built into the system. For example Japanese bullet trains run in one of the highest earthquake prone regions in the whole world. And they get hit by earthquake frequently. Yet the bullet train delays are messured in seconds! Not minutes, not hours, literally seconds. Not to mention that after more than 50 years of service that haven't been a single passenger fatality. Zero.
Yeah, against a playboy who didn't have any political experience or acumen whatsoever. This should've been a landslide victory for dems. I stand by what I said, Trump won because it was Hilary he was up against. If it were Bernie, Trump wouldn't have had a chance.
Yes I understood that in the second reading. I deleted the comment but I guess it was not propagated in time everywhere. Also you can't add up the men's and women's percentages because the number of participates could vary between the two groups.
Tell me this, why don't "but" and "put" sound similar?
What about "height" and "weight", what's the rule here? And what makes a letter silent in a word? If any of these rules have exceptions, then why are there exceptions?
They are "descriptives" that's literally in the name. Mocking them is equivalent to mocking historians for only knowing the past and not being able to predict the future.
You mean to say that right wing politician can't take a joke without getting offended? What a bunch of snowflakes. Man up, facts don't care about your feelings!
Relevant Climate Town video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2oL4SFwkkw