porous_grey_matter @ porous_grey_matter @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

471

Joined

2 yr. ago

British people know how big their pints are meant to be ahaha

For a criminal charge, absolutely, and that's as it should be. But in lay terms there is a bit of a grey area. I think you can be an overworked bartender who at some level does realise that the pour isn't 100% up to the line (so the customer won't be getting the full pint they ordered), but is too busy or distracted or lazy to really give a shit about making it exactly perfect. Who among us would make every burger perfect if we worked fast food? None, but it's technically illegal in this case. But a punter who'd send a pint back for being less than an ounce under is pretty rare, nobody really cares that much.

I think the real news is that the average pub goer is spending almost three grand a year. Jfc.

Sure, technically, but I doubt it's always on purpose.

No, just sloppy pouring mostly

Electromagnetic field (festival/hacker camp) next weekend!

You can just do

        grep Error5 log.txt
  

That's a feature not a bug.

Eg https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/04/black-spider-memos-second-batch-of-prince-charless-letters-released

They only "officially" dont, but in fact they wield a huge amount of power over the government, there have been several scandals about it in recent years

Yes, if you have a domain you can catch all emails being sent there even if you don't know the name - having the domain means controlling the bit after the @, so every email address with that ending.

To appeal to people who don't really understand how stuff works but think GPU is AI and fast

So close, but you got social studies and English the wrong way round, they go in rainbow order corresponding to the science-to-art spectrum.

They couldn't give less of a shit about the 7 people in the world that use pi-holes

Well yea... If you write "return

<object of some other type>

That's not a source. By that metric every American AV has an NSA backdoor. And, ok, both of these are probably true tbh. But Kaspersky publishes extremely good security research and analysis which is just technical and totally possible to verify independently, so there's no reason to avoid those, even if you don't want to use their software.

The thing you're missing is that other people come in and say the same thing as you, and when they listened to them once, they absolutely freaked the hell out, left bad reviews, maybe threatened to sue or something. So you just have to live with that unfortunately.

Hahahaha, good one

I have a desktop because I find a laptop too restrictive (but I don't really game or anything) and I book travel on my phone