Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PP
Posts
0
Comments
481
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yeha, that's what I can't imagine. What part of their data architecture can't be sharded?

    user accounts? sessions? cache keys? profiles? graphical assets?

    This isn't a highly transactional bank with strong transactional guarantes.

    Would be pretty cool if they explained the issue after fixing it.

  • Is an octopus intelligent? Can an octopus build an airplane?

    Why do you expect these models to have human skills if they are not humans?

    How can they build a house if they don't even have vision or a physical body? Can a paralized human that can only hear and speak build a house? Is that human intelligent?

    This is clearly not human intelligence, it clearly lacks human skills. Does it mean it isn't intelligent and it has no skills?

  • Things we know so far:

    • Humans can train LLMs with new data, which means they can acquire knowledge.
    • LLMs have been proven to apply knowledge, they are acing examns that most humans wouldn't dream of even understanding.
    • We know multi-modal is possible, which means these models can acquire skills.
    • We already saw that these skills can be applied. If it wasn't possible to apply their outputs, we wouldn't use them.
    • We have seen models learn and generate strategies that humans didn't even conceive. We've seen them solve problems that were unsolvable to human intelligence.

    ... What's missing here in that definition of intelligence? The only thing missing is our willingness to create a system that can train and update itself, which is possible.

  • What is intelligence?

    Even if we don't know what it is with certainty, it's valid to say that something isn't intelligence. For example, a rock isn't intelligent. I think everyone would agree with that.

    Despite that, LLMs are starting to blur the lines and making us wonder if what matters of intelligence is really the process or the result.

    A LLM will give you much better results in many areas that are currently used to evaluate human intelligence.

    For me, humans are a black box. I give them inputs and they give me outputs. They receive inputs from reality and they generate outputs. I'm not aware of the "intelligent" process of other humans. How can I tell they are intelligent if the only perception I have are their inputs and outputs? Maybe all we care about are the outputs and not the process.

    If there was a LLM capable of simulating a close friend of yours perfectly, would you say the LLM is not intelligent? Would it matter?

  • I think it is still nice to assume that most users don't have these plugins or filters, and to provide the archived version of the page. That way the effort to find the content is done a single time by a single person instead of everyone.

  • I just downloaded Firefox and installed uBlock on my phone to test this. Didn't work. Any specific settings?

    Edit: hmm OK, figured out the custom filter import for paywalls... do you feel comfortable adding Javascript managed by random people to your browser?

    For anyone who doesn't know this... Install uBlock > My filters > scroll down until you see import...

    Import these two:

    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/liamengland1/miscfilters/master/antipaywall.txt

    https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-clean-filters/-/raw/main/bpc-paywall-filter.txt

    I don't know... I don't feel comfortable doing this. I usually only install trusted stuff in my machines. This feels like an easy way to get screwed.

    That person could go rogue and then you have malicious Javascript running next to your credentials on every tab.

    Edit 2: after checking in detail, those filters aren't Javascript logic. So it seems fine. I thought it was some form of minimized Javascript