ohwhatfollyisman @ ohwhatfollyisman @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

490

Joined

2 yr. ago

my biggest question around her is how many margarets did she actually end up thatching?

"Actually Indians".

q. Which is the best Stallone franchise? Rambo?

a. Naw! Rocky!

but this article espouses that llms do the opposite of logic, planning, and reasoning?

quoting:

Claude, on occasion, will give a plausible-sounding argument designed to agree with the user rather than to follow logical steps. We show this by asking it for help on a hard math problem while giving it an incorrect hint. We are able to “catch it in the act” as it makes up its fake reasoning,

are there any sources which show that llms use logic, conduct planning, and reason (as was asserted in the 2nd level comment)?

wait until you hear the concept of contra-entries.

but there's been significant research and progress in tracing internals of LLMs, that show logic, planning, and reasoning.

would there be a source for such research?

this article is why secondary sources (and beyond) are important.

the op is just an assertion made by cbc with no sources (credible or otherwise) whatsoever.

a spectacularly healthy dose of cherry-picking with this one.

what about watching movies at the cinema? playing video games on the tv? train carriages? the back seat of a car? double beds? panoramas? the horizon? a computer's qwerty keyboard? side-by-side boobs? side-by-side arms? the ending shootout of the good, the bad, the ugly? thw viewscreen of the starship enterprise? car windscreens? baby got back? landscape paintings?

i'm starting my own ai model. does anyone have any of those copywritten materials to feed it?

and stroll got only one for actually clattering into leclerc?!

obligatory steve mould video explaining how it works.

/r/aboeingdystopia

how many judge judy cases are about problems caused by runaway children? there's a reason why laws mandate leashes for dogs -- their scope for damage is far higher than is that for toddlers.

a pet doesn't leave behind an estate to inherit. laws are hesitant on human euthanasia because of the scope of misuse by greedy beneficiaries of wills.

flat-earthers hate this one proof.

"my dart will go on..."

Police arrived at the scene around 18:30 local time (12:30 GMT)

that doesn't add up. did they mean 00:30 GMT?

additional sources for other points:

1. terrorist bomb blasts in mumbai 2006 BBC
2. terrorist attacks in mumbai 2008 PBS
3. terrorist attacks on india's parliament 2001 BBC Sounds podcast (the most neutral source i could find)
4. osama bin laden and pakistan timeline BBC
5. timeline of terror attacks in india random source

this reuters article is one.

the problem is that all public news articles will be sketchy this early in the game. most relevant information is still classified and not available yet.

Did they have intel that Pakistan was actually involved in a tourist attack or is this assumption?

EDIT: to clarify, pakistan itself is not involved on the killing of tourists, but there is evidence to support that the group that did kill the tourists have complete patronage of pakistan's army and government and are shielded by them.

the intel or its source is not shared publicly yet, though. nobody can say for sure why it hasn't been shared yet but the conjecture is that it's to protect a sensitive set of sources based in pakistan from retaliation.

india has put itself on the backfoot. fighting this war is like trying to wrestle with a pig--india will only muddy itself while the pig loves it. they wouldn't put themselves in such a position unless there was compelling evidence to do so.

separately, this isn't the first attack on indian civilians by members of groups sheltered in pakistan by all their official and legal machinery. this isn't even the first successful such attack.

these attacks are akin to the september 11 attacks on the twin towers (in that innocent civilians are targeted by a deeply planned and coordinated attack with the sole aim to spread fear and terror). and that was reason enough for the usa to conduct an operation in pakistan's heartland to "get" osama (who himself was sheltered by the same people in pakistan's army and government).