True. It's also there when you look for chrome and other browsers. (Except Vivaldi and opera which have also bought ad space) That's how buying ads works. Fucked up, but nothing new, unfortunately.
Guess you're outside the EU or something? Cause it looks different over here, Firefox isn't mentioned here. Also they're at 4.9 instead of 4.7 for some reason.
Either way, fuck brave.
The original comment was the guy saying he needs a publisher or someone to give him deadlines in order to get the game out in a timely fashion. That doesn't sound like "I don't give a shit about the game" to me. Even if it was just an observation, if the comment was intended to allude to his mental issues, it's still not a publisher that he needs.
That feels unnecessarily harsh. Especially since music is subjective and he's purposefully not using his greatest skill, the electric guitar... and while I'm not a fan of the nightwatchman stuff, the music itself isn't bad, just not my cup of tea. Also, the Audioslave stuff is great too, not just RATM. That's already two hugely successful bands, which is 2 more than most artists.
Exactly. If there was only one currency for all old content, everyone would just do the most efficient farm and buy everything that way and not interact with any of the related content.
While I wish you were right, something tells me that even with an 80-100$ pricetag it'll still be one of the most successful games ever released.
Look at diablo4, for example. 70$ base game, 90 for deluxe, and 100 for ultimate plus mtx in the store at stupid prices. And apparently it's sold over 6 million copies and made over 600 mil in revenue in the first week. And it's not even a good game, in my opinion.
Yeah, definitely it was because of your issues and not just because it was a bad game. How did disco Elysium gross 84 mil being such a political game, again? Helldivers 2? Cyberpunk? Rdr? Metal gear? Fallout? Deus ex? Papers please?
C'mon.. I've never heard of a good game being unpopular because of its politics.. are there any?
Yes, in the context and ignoring everything else, sure, I agree. But to me, it makes no sense how someone could believe that republicans are somehow pro big business but anti big tech. Talking about these things as if they're unrelated doesn't make sense to me. Maybe I'm just missing something, I guess.
Ok, maybe he wasn't praising republicans as a whole, but he did praise trump for picking a big tech lobbyist in a job in which he claims to want the opposite. "Great pick!" is a praise, you can't deny that, can you?
"Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote."
That's their official account complaining about the guy's daughters being lobbyists, not even him directly. Why is the appointment of Gail Slater, who worked the internet association (big tech lobbyists) and fox corporation, a great pick?
There's nothing to gain from this for the publishers and such. They will however miss out on sales. So I don't see this happening. The feature would be cool to have as a customer, ofc.
Well, when you think about it, it makes sense. It's a versatile and cool sounding word format or whatever you call it. You can use it for literal stuff, such as Titanfall, where robots fall from the sky or comets or whatever. But also in a collapse kind of thing, like here. And fallen civilizations and apocalypses are a popular themes, so..
True. It's also there when you look for chrome and other browsers. (Except Vivaldi and opera which have also bought ad space) That's how buying ads works. Fucked up, but nothing new, unfortunately.