nun @ nun @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

33

Joined

2 mo. ago

Israel considers the Syrian Golan heights and large chunks of the Palestinian West Bank including Jerusalem as parts of Israel. They effectively occupy and control the entire area of Palestine.

It already includes the West Bank and a chunk of Syria.

Man this is Reddit levels of bait at least make it believable

Yes, Israel obviously is and always has been the aggressor in this conflict. They are also the much more evil side. Doesn’t mean Hamas is incapable of also committing war crimes

They’re not dying for nothing. The state of Israel in its current form will not survive this war.

You’re not supposed to feel bad she was an influencer, whatever that means. You’re supposed to feel bad that 11-year-old children are being intentionally targeted by airstrikes.

Not even a little? I recognise that many of their actions are clearly immoral or inhumane but I’m not self righteous enough to know I wouldn’t do the same if everyone I know was murdered, tortured, raped and starved by Israel.

The law of war governs conduct during armed conflict, regardless of whether or not a formal declaration of war exists or how disproportionate said conflict is

Hey Goosebumps are great

Fair

So the way it was explained to me was like email. You can use your Gmail to send an email to someone using Outlook for example. So this post is hosted on for example lemmy.world (I cant actually figure out how to check yet) but I can still interact with it from my lemm.ee account. If for some reason I was banned from .world I wouldnt be able to interact with this post but would still be able to post and comment in any communities hosted on one of the other instances.

This is a dictionary definition. Non-combatant ISIS members are also civilians. Whether they deserve to die or not has no legal bearing. Im unsure why that is considered controversial.

I enjoy the social aspect of running. Parkruns, Strava, meeting friends and getting coffee after etc.

This is not the legal definition of civilian.

He is by definition a civilian that was murdered. Legal definitions do not care about our political opinions. It appears to be very likely he was a civilian who deserved to be murdered but that does not change the definition

? Who said he was innocent

Clearly everyone here is illiterate lol

Literally the opposite of what I said. How do you go from ‘hard to feel sad about it’ to ‘ it’s truly terrible’?

Yes? They deserve to be held accountable but even in a fair legal system they would not face the death penalty while those actually directly participating in or ordering war crimes would.

Nah. It’s very easy to argue that murder is ethically wrong or unjustified but it certainly is effective.