This suggests the planet may be teeming with microbial life, the researchers said. They stressed, however, that they are not announcing the discovery of actual living organisms but rather a possible biosignature - an indicator of a biological process - and that the findings should be viewed cautiously, with more observations needed.
Researchers that have had the media blow their findings out of proportion and take their words out of context one too many times.
This is exciting enough on it's own without the "help" of overzealous reporters making click-bait headlines and misleading people.
Double check that the AC unit doesn't pull more than 15A {Amps). That's all those smart plugs are rated for. It's probably fine, but you don't want to start a fire. I've seen pictures of smart plugs that melted when used on some refrigerators.
Good plan. I think the temp sensor will be an excellent addition. Whole setup could pay for itself in saved energy not leaving the AC running unnecessarily.
Now what is more interesting is that comments per post varies by instance, lemmy.world for example has an engagement of 9.5 c/p and lemmy.ml has 4.8 c/p
I don't understand what this is supposed to mean. The commenter's account, or the community they posted to is on .world/.ml? Because those aren't necessarily the same.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation reviewed documents allegedly written by the teen, which calls for the assassination of Trump and the start of a revolution to "save the white race," according to federal court documents.
My guess is that the plan was to frame "the left" for the assassination and trigger a race war. These nuts are so itching for a fight that they believe that the entire country is on the verge of neighbors fighting neighbors, and they just need to push it over the edge.
Everyone should be aware that OP is clearly using AI to summarize the articles they're posting, and the summaries are garbage. This is the second one I'm calling out. Here's the first.
First sentence of summary;
The EU suspended its planned tariffs on €20.9 billion in U.S. goods after Trump paused his new 10% tariff on all EU imports, opting for a 90-day truce.
In the actual article.
Trump had hit the 27-nation bloc with a 20 percent duty on all goods. Under pressure as financial markets melted down, he halved the levy to 10 percent — the baseline he has set in his bid to bring investment and industrial jobs lost to globalization back home.
In short, summary says 10% tarrif was paused. This is completely wrong. The 20% tarrif was paused and reduced to the 10% baseline he set for everyone (which is still extremely high).
OP, if you're not going to proofread AI generated summaries for accuracy, don't use them.
No, that's not clumsy wording. It's nonsense. Beijing isn't going to "respond in kind" to China raising tariffs. As you correctly stated, Beijing is China. What if it said, "The United States raised tariffs to ___% on Chinese goods, with Washington DC responding in kind."? It's exactly the same nonsense.
China raised tariffs to 125% on US goods, with Beijing responding in kind.
Summary written by AI.
Edit: For those not seeing it, in this context, Beijing is China. So, China responded to China? That's the kind of nonsense an AI writes, and that sentence is nowhere to be found in the original article. Hence, "Summary written by AI."
Whenever the topic comes up with leadership, I try to explain it in financial terms.
Tech debt is just like financial debt. There are times when its appropriate and necessary to take on some debt. But debt accumulates interest charges. If we just keep building up more debt without ever paying it down, it'll eventually bankrupt the company.
The engineering team doesn't always know when the finance team is accumulating debt or paying it back, but we trust that they are doing so appropriately.
You don't always know when the engineering team is accumulating or paying off debt, but you need to trust that when we say we need time to to pay down tech debt, we're serious. We'll all be out of a job if we don't.
They don't usually like to hear it, but when put in those terms, they don't have an argument against it. I'm sure if we could provide a statement showing we had $478,562.78 in tech debt at 4.75%, they'd be more understanding about paying it down.
Researchers that have had the media blow their findings out of proportion and take their words out of context one too many times.
This is exciting enough on it's own without the "help" of overzealous reporters making click-bait headlines and misleading people.