NSRXN @ nsrxn @lemmy.dbzer0.com

About

---

Read more

Posts

6

Comments

664

Joined

7 mo. ago

copying isn't stealing.

an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

that isn't stealing.

you also assumed my reasons

i think an enterprising, forward-thinking, reasonable person could figure out how to practice.

you're projecting your values and ethical system onto me.

that's not proof they aren't conscious

real catch22

I'm driving

yea. don't drive fast.

You just put your line at believing that humans have agency, even though you just as much can’t prove that.

you're projecting.

You’re already doing it, otherwise you will be having zero problems with killing and eating random humans.

no, that's not the basis of my moral decisions

I also can’t prove that you have one

so it's probably not a good basis for making moral decisions

derivative work and stealing labor

no, it's not

copying isn't stealing, and modeling isn't even copying.

the greatest threat an artist faces isn't that someone might copy their work, but that no one will want to

comparing women to animals is what misogynists do. comparing colored people to animals is what slavers do.

suffering and pleasure, and and it’s morally wrong to inflict the first and deny the second

this is only true under a limited set of moral beliefs. most people aren't utilitarians though

Plants don’t have an agent that feels negative or positive feelings.

you can't prove that

they are not able to feel pain or emotions

you can't prove that

most people don't believe that. I think it's fair to ask for some justification