NSRXN @ nsrxn @lemmy.dbzer0.com

About

---

Read more

Posts

6

Comments

662

Joined

7 mo. ago

never ascribed you any motivations

anyone can read that you did

Why should I care what "professional philosophers" do?

they're the experts on ethics and logic, both of which you seem to think you have a firm grasp on. I'm pointing out that you are probably mistaken.

whenever you realize being wrong about something you just switch to another topic.

I'm following your lead. if you want to stick with your assertions about pleasure and suffering I'll be glad to eviscerate utilitarianism for you.

I can be sovereign without rights

It doesn't matter here at all what Kant said since most people don't agree with him on that.

actually most professional philosophers are deontologists. and they eat meat and eggs and dairy.

Your arguments lack any logic

you're wrong, and making a statement like this doesn't make it true

you're wrong about my motivations, and your personal values are not universal.

it's a millennialism.

rights are not real, and convincing people they have them actually allows their sovereignty to be infringed.

Kant dealt with this like 200 years ago. have you tried actually learning any ethical philosophy?

https://www.usmint.gov/learn/coins-and-medals/commemorative-coins/harriet-tubman

these are valid currency. spend them.

edit: it doesn't look like they're shipping yet. but i can't wait to let a few jingle around my pocket!

Are you going to claim they all suffer from the same flawed methodology? Do you also believe that climate change is a hoax?

Bring your counterpoints, not personal accusations.

i'm certainly willing to read any study you can present. this study relies almost entirely on poore-nemecek 2018, which combined LCA data gathered with disparate methodologies, and did so against the guidance of the LCA studies themselves. it's garbage. it's not science. writing a study that relies so heavily on that study is also garbage.

if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all

I don’t need to be friendly

kindly point out

sealioning

pfft. quit it kiddo, you’re not equipped for this.

toxicity

this study is just warmed-over poore-nemecek 2018, and suffers from the same flawed methodology to make its hyperbolic claims

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCAmsQZQPXw

Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

copying isn't stealing.

an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence