Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NO
Posts
0
Comments
551
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This feels like a flimsy solution to the problem that will fail. I guess that when Medicaid recipients don't/won't/can't sign up, the government will take away their healthcare and use slave labor from prisons to catch up.

    I think in six months they will be saying: "hey we tried this idea with Medicare recipients, but they just wanted to stay home and play video games. Now our crops are in danger of not being harvested.

    What if... We round up some of these bad prisoners and make them work for almost free!? That will kill two stones."

  • Clear concise code that reads like documentation is the ideal. Good function and variable names, formatting, and encapsulation play into this. Tests should document and describe the system.

    If it still isn't clear what the code is doing, and I'm all out of ideas (or time) for refactoring, a well placed, accurate comment is fine. It needs to be kept up to date like any other artifact in the project.

    It's harder to keep comments accurate than code, since code can be executed and tested. I use them sparingly; when I've otherwise failed to write clean code, or the code is just so complex that it needs to be described.

    Comments are just another tool in the toolbox. If they add clarity to the situation, by all means, use them.

    If you can think of an expressive variable name that lets you skip a comment eg "employeeCount", instead of "e" // number of employees, do that.

  • You act like 100% of old people voted trump. They favored him 52 to 47 according to the AARP.

    I understand you are angry, but just being blindly mad at a group of people due to prejudice and stereotyping is not ok. It's exactly what the Republicans are doing with trans and brown people. You are no better than them.

  • Disadvantaged old people in nursing homes are about to lose their healthcare, bankrupt their families, and die horrible deaths.

    It's not whomp whomp unless you are a sociopath.

    Billionaires are to blame. This is a class war. I don't want to sacrifice human beings for tax cuts regardless of how they may have voted.

  • Maybe, probably. They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about... well everything.

    They can prop up a white male moderate with an ounce of charisma, someone that is around 45. People will be refreshed that this candidate speaks in complete sentences and the capacity for empathy -- like a real person.

    That's what they want, business as usual sold as a revolutionary idea. Will people buy it? Who knows.. groups of people are pretty dumb.