nodoze313 @ nodoze313 @lemmynsfw.com

Posts

0

Comments

22

Joined

2 yr. ago

My wife would notice in a few hours, and be panicked in less than 12. Work would notice in <12-16 hours weekdays, <60 hours weekend.

My father, back in the 90s, got into a fist fight with 2 guys over this, they had a boom box, he got stitches because one of their girlfriends came up from behind and hit him in the head with the radio. He was hot tempered. Glad you weren't drawn into a confrontation and used your head.

Second this, it was the largest blocker, but also time, with other classes and the cadence of the school year, that didn't align well with the real world timeframes.

Know - no

Hold theories - still no (definitely many lost to history)

Of the modern documented set, it seems like there are decent theories, but far from definitive. I'd go as far as to say there's a 50/50 chance that the field is right about at least 1 instance, see Pasteur.

Agreed it's toward the direction, but too far to say it's substantial.

I was unaware that these creatures had an entire pseudo science, but I guess it makes sense. But the definition of knowledge is antithetical to this entire study, since at it's core it studies the undetermined. No question is stupid, but this is blatantly ignorant. Still I'm glad you asked it because I learned something new

WTF RI?

They're saying don't cast blame, instead move from a position of empathy to open their eyes. Certainly they made a bad decision, but they're uneducated, poor and likely brainwashed, which is only reinforced by negative action. Their plight is an opportunity to commiserate and bring clarity to the situation.

Every year I take the day off, because it is almost always a perfect day in RI, low 70s, light breeze and sunny. It's probably some confirmation bias, but in the last few years it's been true.

They're not disputing ultra pasteurization, but due to the new lack of control implementation, it doesn't necessarily have to happen making it no different than the rush associated with regular milk.

Thanks for the info! I was unaware of the Spain and Portugal options, so looked it up.

Spain ended their program in January, with application deadline April 3.

Potugal ended their real estate version, but still has investment options.

I think it's great, because there's plenty of opportunity to covfefe

UDP cares about the target, it doesn't care if it gets there, more like broadcast.

Looks like AI to me. It did a pretty good job on her hands, by comparison to many other AI rendered hands, at least she has 5 normal fingers even if they're sausages

https://mazuri.com/collections/primate

https://www.amazon.com/ZuPreem-Primate-Diet-Dry-20/dp/B0002ARMVS

They do, primate food.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_core

I ran some rough numbers on this, please pick apart. It takes 10 acres of hardwood to heat 2k ft^2 sustainably. If all land was divided equally between all living humans there would be about 2 acres per person. Not everyone needs heating, trees do not grow on 100% of the land. Definitely appears to be a privileged point, but there's some gray area.

As a temporary solution, while waiting for heat pumps to be competitive, and solar taking down huge swaths of trees, it could be rationalized to make sense, especially over oil heating.

In the area I'm located, most electric is generated by LNG at 40% efficiency, the avg daily temperature is 30°F, heat pump performs at ~1.25x. Burning wood at 50% efficiency appears to be more carbon neutral solution, when compared to all other solutions, even if you were to bury the wood taken down. At least temporarily, but when the renewable solutions are in place, it's a no brainier, heat pumps win.

I don't fully agree with the original comment, but it's not a 0IQ thought, it's best intentions, around an area of gray. There isn't a right answer, it's a moving target with a complex calculation and we need people who are trying to do the right thing, even if it's good intentions gone wrong.

Well done, great jokes, lots of subtle references, love it!

Not every single one, that would be too expensive, make it the next to last so their confidence is high.

Does running lint prior not resolve the issue? Isn't this the entire goal of make, cmake, autotools, etc? Why do you need to run it after? So you can re-process the macros after they are in line? Should just validate the macros before running gcc.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy