mypasswordistaco @ mypasswordistaco @iusearchlinux.fyi

Posts

5

Comments

51

Joined

2 yr. ago

You have misunderstood what I wrote. I said nothing about an employee purchasing a flag, I said that they would not be permitted to raise one, as they are a resource that is paid for by the act.

I think it's "asinine and childish" to be so rude, especially when it's you that has made the mistake.

Right, but the public employee is being paid for by the funds that are covered by the act. Therefore if an employee raises the flag, funds are being used to display a non-state flag.

Edit: To be clear, I have not suggested that an employee of the state wouldn't be allowed to purchase a flag. The way I read the act, an employee would not be allowed to raise a flag because they themselves are a resource paid for by the act.

I would think that the "or display" part prohibits a public employee from raising the flag.

Thanks for the reply! I think I'm going to pull the trigger on the white one as well. Can't wait!

Which color did you get, and how do you like it? I'm really leaning towards this option.

Yeah I'm getting the sense that it'll be a good choice, I just think they're hideous.

Will do, thanks!

What if I want to use my absolute freedom to oppress someone else? What if I use my absolute freedom to build a structure that blocks the view of the mountains from my neighbors, who love the view? Whose freedom should get oppressed to solve that?

Honest question, not trying to be a contrarian.

I think it's unfortunate that you're being so hostile. It was an interesting point and very good sources that you brought to the discussion. But you've decided to play the "you're all 'autists' " card.

I disagree. The connotation and literal meaning of the phrase "doing better than", combined with the comment on social circles indicates that they're trying to suggest the poor are somehow doing well, whatever that means.

That's how I read it, anyway. And I think that's why they're getting down voted as well.

I think the wording in your original comment is pretty misguided. Nowhere does it say the poor are "doing better than" the wealthy. They just had the strongest short-term wage growth since covid. This does not equate to prosperity. Perhaps it is you that has the restrictive social circle.

If anything it'll be below 100 due to altitude. For example salt water for making pasta boils still at approx 100 deg. C. It takes quite a lot of salt (way more than you would ever want to consume) to meaningfully raise the boiling point.

You must be at altitude. That definitely makes a difference for the boiling point, but of course water freezes at 0. Impurities that you'll encounter in tap water, for example, will not have a large effect on freezing point.

Even if it was different by a few degrees, how does that make the scale any less intuitive?

I don't know what high school you went to, but we sure as shit didn't cover stuff like partial differential equations and functional analysis.

Not at all. People (engineers?) seem to forget that experimental physicists exist

What of experimental physicists?

X-Tube

You're straw-manning. No one is advocating for flooding the country with foreign money. I've been reading your comments and I think you might be misunderstanding the argument. It's a more nuanced criticism about capitalism, not an argument for how much workers for foreign companies in the Philippines should be paid.

This is cultural. Some cultures really do not care about nudity the way others do