MotorheadKusanagi @ motorheadkusanagi @lemmy.world

The net is vast and infinite

---

Read more

Posts

2

Comments

48

Joined

2 yr. ago

sic semper tyrannis? you're seriously referencing john wilkes booth with your username?!

Oh, I think it encouraged the Republicans a lot more than you're giving credit for.

So it may feel like things didnt go crazy, but I'd argue everything about 9/11 would have been different if Democrats were in office. Probably would not have invaded Afghanistan, for example. Probably wouldve had better handling of the economy leading up to the 2008 crisis.

But with that said, I do understand that for many, it didnt feel like it had a big impact.

The supreme court decided the outcome of a Presidential election and no one batted an eye lash.

That was pretty weird, IMO, and a hint of what was to come.

Flatpak or just docker would be better. Snap is redundant.

That misses the point, imo. Much of Hashi's ecosystem was created by people who contributed to the product believing it was community owned, as that's what the license said.

Oracle tried to do similar when they closed the source for Hudson. Hudson was forked, creating Jenkins, and I would be surprised if folks even remember Hudson today.

Oxide Computing gets into the details on their podcast: https://youtu.be/QaU94LY891M

seriously it is so stupid

Biden can always use the 14th amendment to tell them to get lost.

It isnt a theory. Steve Calabresi, one of the founders of the Federalist Society, whom we'd think should be against this interpretation, wrote an article for Reason in support of the original paper.

https://reason.com/volokh/2023/08/10/trump-is-disqualified-from-being-on-any-election-ballots/

The core of the argument is that current context is an extremely good match for the context that created the law in the first place. They seem to believe it enough to think it should be regarded as true. For some reason...

So let's consider incentives. Why would they want to avoid a court case? Is it possible they'd lose and somehow make a radical event take place in US law?

Maybe they believe it is self-preservation in some way, to avoid a historically significant court decision going against them. Or another way, maybe theyre low key trying to somehow move on.

This may be the closest thing the Republican Party ever does to waving the white flag. They never admit defeat.

We're werehouses here, not swearhouses.

Welp... now Im expecting Linux kernel modules for anticheat.

does this count as a post about reddit? 🤔

The presence of some intelligence is not sufficiently persuasive for changing terminology when the point is to insult them. Duhhhh.

Maybe daft raft would roll off the tongue more easily

Can we stop saying think tank, as though these dummies actually think..?

You listed them in a different order from how they appear in the link preview and it's messing with my mind maaannnnnnn

have you seen gen z?

Meh. Still nothing next to what CCP does in China.

yawn

Adtech spies on you with it. The gov piggybacks on adtech.