As long as AI is advertised as being a unique selling point, I'm not interested.
If you think of specific problems it is better to point them out and try think of solutions, not reject the technology as a whole.
Yes. There a problems with the Gnome desktop environment. Without looking at the issue tracker, I can assure you that AI is not the solution to any of them. Even if AI may be a possible solution to a problem, it would probably not be the best one.
Adding to what other people said, I want to suggest using the Blue Oak Model License. It is comparable to the MIT license (so no copyleft) but much more readable and easier to understand.
The Typst compiler is available under the Apache License 2.0.
The web app at https://typst.app is proprietary but also completely optional. You can use Typst with only a text editor supporting the LSP (VSCodium, Kate, Atom, ...), typst-lsp (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) and the Typst compiler.
Actually, most of the guests are VMs (instead of LXCs) because many services I host are most easily deployed via Docker Compose and Docker in LXCs requires workarounds I don't fully understand thr implications of.
Great technology is invisible.
As long as AI is advertised as being a unique selling point, I'm not interested.
Yes. There a problems with the Gnome desktop environment. Without looking at the issue tracker, I can assure you that AI is not the solution to any of them. Even if AI may be a possible solution to a problem, it would probably not be the best one.