Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MO
Posts
83
Comments
515
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's the Fediverse that I have been searching for.

    Somebody on Lemmy made this quote I really like:

    Twitter is people you care about posting content you don't care about. Reddit is people you don't care about posting content that you do care about

    Twitter-like Fedi never clicked for me. I made a bunch of accounts over the course of two, maybe three years, each starting with the intention of maybe making new friends and having a good time. I met a ton of cool people but we never became good friends because I never got really invested into it, simply because my feed was never something I hoped it would be, something exciting.

    Lemmy gives me exactly what I was searching for. I didn't use it prior to thr Reddit migration because there were too few people but now I am very happy

  • I've replaced Flameshot with Spectacle on my system because it is preinstalled on Plasma, has almost the same set of features and, in my experience, work snappier. Also, Flameshot can have issues working on Wayland

  • I mean, it's hard to write when you don't have anything to write about. Try keeping a journal of things when you move to other place or go camping, there probably would be a ton of stuff to write about and keeping a journal would be much easier

  • You seem like you just want to lick someone's boot. Two wrongs doesn't make one right, people come to Mozilla because it provides an alternative corp-free browser. If someone in the industry does bad things people want not to see that in Mozilla. This basically covers most of the points you made

    They probably rely on donations because ppl like you, and the author of the article you linked, cannot admit that Mozilla can invest in projects like... Thanks for making a nice strawman up, friend.

    1.They don't rely on donations. Period. Donations are their additional source, they only rely on Google's funding

    1. I didn't link to shit except the financial report made by Mozilla. I wouldn't have posted the article because of the last paragraphs where the author whines about "mah political organisations" and "agenda!!1!" like a typical right winger Don't equate me with the author of the article, I only defend some of his points because they were already made by others years ago, it's no new discovery to everyone, except you, apparently, that Mozilla is using their funds poorly

    You don't have to reply to any of that, it's evident that my arguments can't help you if you find record pays for CEO whilst firing regular employees in a supposedly not-for-profit/non-profit organisation normal

  • Are you joking on me? Is paying ungodly amounts to the CEO whilst firing employees and losing market share normal to you? https://itdm.com/mozilla-firefox-usage-down-85-but-why-are-execs-salary-up-400/2050/

    Is claiming Mozilla relies on donations whilst in fact this is a lie normal to you?

    Is messing around with financing browser development whilst the browser is their biggest, by FAR, source of income normal to you?

    Non-profit owning a for-profit is a joke, it is not OK