But it will still be pulled down by earth's gravity. And depending on the size, it's not going to just evaporate if it has a planet's gravity pushing rock and metal into it.
A high speed black hole would just punch through the earth, but if it just falls down, it would destroy the planet.
except bifold and trifold are established terms for wallets, brochures, etc.
I think it makes more sense like this, anyway, especially considering that those words don't really refer to the folds themselves. (trifold can just mean triple)
The first part is true, it's super expensive. But anecdotally therapy is very socially acceptable and mental health is openly talked about, in younger generations at least.
Not sure why you're being downvoted for this, especially when you state it as your belief.
I do think it's likely accurate, too. If you look at brain scans, we can see that decisions are made before we're consciously aware of them. Also split brain patients will attribute intent to actions of their completely separate hemisphere.
I don't think this is a healthy mindset, though. Personally I think this way as a coping mechanism more than anything else, even if I do genuinely believe it's likely how the universe works.
There are other nutrients than vitamin c and a, but If you're eating a high seafood diet and lots of liver, great.
Low carb isn't going to magically protect you from cancer and heart disease. Studies don't have to be specifically on low carb diets to be valid.
Also 'may be a significant risk factor' is normal scientific wording for finding a statistical correlation.
the intuit lived without plants, and without cancer
I don't think we have evidence for that, and I'm not sure it's even relevant.
More importantly though, even the best farming practices, there is no sustainable or environmentally friendly way to produce meat. Again, I'm not sure what the Inuit have to do with that, given how different our modern meat industry is. But growing food, feeding it to animals (who produce greenhouse gasses), and eating those animals is an extremely inefficient and destructive way to get food. Not to mention the horrific treatment, enslavement, and killing of those animals.
Though I do purchase my meat directly from a sustainable farm.
Even if it's relatively "sustainable" compared to other meat production, it still has an enormous environmental cost compared to plant foods.
I don't expect to change your mind about this, and if this diet is the only thing that works for you personally to address your gut issues, so be it, I can't really fault you for that.
But anyone else reading this should know that it's neither healthy nor sustainable.
Keto is interesting, I haven't personally tried it, but I definitely think it can be a useful tool, even if we don't know how safe it is long term. However there are plant based ketogenic diets, so I don't think that really supports a carnivore diet. It still remains that meat is linked to heart disease and cancer.
Nutrient density and bioavailability is a fair point, but nothing that can't be compensated for by either eating more of certain foods or supplements within a plant based diet. And even if you were convinced that meat is necessary anyway, how is a full meat diet better than a mixed diet?
As far as ethics and environmental cost, while I agree with you that it could be less bad, meat production will never be ethical, nor sustainable. Raising cows for example, even with the most natural methods, still uses an enormous amout of resources including land and water for feed. And unless you're somehow capturing the methane produced, that has a significant environmental cost as well.
The current reality of the meat industry today is much worse, though. If you're eating meat today, you're supporting today's meat industry.
What about traveling slightly off axis? Could even tack back and forth.