Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MC
Posts
0
Comments
21
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Brilliant man, love his music.

    He’s always been EXTREME anti-authoritarian, anti-war, anti-establishment. Consistent, at least, in his positions. I don’t always agree, but I respect.

    And without full context or quotes, I will not rush to judgement — an extreme man who takes extreme positions, meant to challenge.

    And no matter what they tell you, it’s possible to be against the actions of the Israeli state without being antisemitic.

  • I did. And, again at your request. And, what’s your point?

    There are plenty of communities to share memes here, not sure why a “tech news” one needs to support this kind of idiocy.

  • I do appreciate the effort to contain memes. But, quite frankly, I avoid memes like the plague because 9 out of 10 are not funny or insightful — most just regurgitate the same tired tropes and worn out jokes. I am disappointed to find them here.

  • I see no article here.

    I agree with the general premise you present, but let’s be clear: there is a BIG difference between framing this example as “invading horde” and “migrants”. One of these, at least, aims to present an acceptably neutral term, while the other targets a more visceral and inflammatory response. Both sides are not the same.

  • Resign? Nah, the show is just about to get interesting!

    That look on his face is exactly what would happen at the start of Quantum Leap. Grab some popcorn and see what historic wrong Dr. Samuel Beckett rights in this episode!

  • Yes, emphatically YES!

    There was a dramatic shift in tone from the Trump White House during the early COVID days once it was realized that the virus outbreak centered on urban areas.

    And it was incredibly obvious to anybody paying attention.

  • We can agree to disagree. “The Software” was delivered, source included. And you as end consumer are free to redistribute and maintain as you wish.

    However, I cannot see any contract law judgement that would force continuation of a subscription model on the vendor (in perpetuity!) if they do not wish to remain under contract.

  • That’s a fair point, and worthy of deliberation.

    However, I would continue to argue that if Redhat does not restrict parties’ rights to the source code they’ve been given, then they’ve satisfied the GPL.

    It is my understanding (at least initially) that the GPL was meant to solidify the end user’s rights to the software they have, so that they’re not left with an unfixable binary executable.

    And again, there are no rights granted by the GPL for FUTURE versions.