Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PA
Posts
1
Comments
165
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • I think the only legitimate chance Democrats have is Luigi Mangione. You have to fight fire with fire. He's young, smart, charismatic, from a well to do background, and not even a felon like our current president. Also brave unlike our Republican chickenshit losers. Sanders as running mate.

  • Bingo. My entire circle is 1-5%ers, we are privileged and comfortable and not saying we're not part of the problem. But we're powerless. Start by eating the richest, by the time you get to me I'm going to guess there won't be a problem any more...

  • AI sure can fix this problem. "Sure, I can help with that. Here's your rhetorical web article about recycling actually being a sign of homosexuality or closeted femininty, aimed at 25 to 65 year old conservative men in your electorate, as requested. Let me know if you want any modifications".

  • When I was 21, I dated a 19 year old and the age gap felt huge. When I was 20 I dated an 18 year old (I thought she was my age, her friends misled me) and the age gap was even bigger, I was pissed at her friends. A few other times, same story, also when they were 2 years older or even 1 year younger. I don't get these people...

  • Find one person, and I mean one that isn't skewed by knowing the context of the case. Jury nullification is the correct course when it's very, very clear that the prosecution is acting in bad faith. I have no idea the facts, I do know the prosecution is lying about the narrative because we're not stupid.

  • Why do you assume it's a yellow tint? What if all the objects in the back are simply yellow?

    The actual object is blue, the actual photograph is white. They are two separate concepts. We only think it's blue because we were told - how do we even know that's true, have you seen the dress in person? Using a color picker is the only objective solution that doesn't rely on flawed interference.

  • I definitely don't. He's a hero because he's innocent and stood bravely against abusive treatment by the state. Too much fuckery for me to believe even hard evidence presented before my eyes. We know when we're being fucked with.

  • Leaving his front tooth in his burger wrapper was the clincher. Luigi Mangione is also missing that same front tooth. The blood sample matched as well, Luigi's black eye was confirmed to be the source of the blood. If he couldn't do the crime, he shouldn't have beaten himself up and left dental records.

  • Right. Since we have no context, the dress is white and gold objectively. Assuming context of the color of the light is incorrect, we don't have it. The dress is actually black and purple but the image is doctored to be white and gold. So it's white and gold. The image is not the object. We're talking about the image, not the object.

    Zooming up on the checker, it's objectively gray. Zooming out, it's objectively white. The only correct interpretation is the shadow darkens the image. But in the dress picture, we don't know what the color of the light is, so it's not comparable.