michaelmrose @ michaelmrose @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

871

Joined

2 yr. ago

shut up

You don't have the alternative to go into other people's country and round up people because people will absolutely shoot any such folks then drop bomb's on your cities and forces. It's not my fault you are confused about what the options are.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/21/middleeast/iran-nuclear-sites-hit-us-explainer-intl-hnk

They are enriching uranium to 60% Note CNN isnt the only source for this.

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/conversion-enrichment-and-fabrication/uranium-enrichment

They need 3-5% for nuclear power

What do you think they are doing. Experts say not that they aren't working towards the appropriate tech but that they aren't close.

You listed all sorts of sources but cited specific statements do you could borrow the appearance of expertise while putting your statements in their mouths.

For instance I looked into the iaea I could find no statement to the effect that they aren't working towards nuclear weapons. They would in fact be stupid not to.

As far as I can tell you are confused. I look forward to your detailed sources and reputations

They can stop enrichment of uranium any time it's not even the only choice for nuclear power and they long surpassed the target they need to generate power. They ARE trying for nukes just aren't close due to first negotiations then sabatogue and murders.

Iran is a terrorist state run by lunatics. Them and Israel having them is even worse than Israel having them.

This is the dumbest possible position because it maximizes the chance that they are used. There is no reason to think mad working was likely amongst a few actors and it almost failed repeatedly. There is even less reason to suppose it scales.

We in the USA are telling farmers that they won't deport their labor if they are accountable to them. They can very easily have those who defect or resist in any way deported to concentration camps. They can also be imprisoned for trying to slip over the border the other way.

Why would anyone do this? Why wouldn't the normal legal process supported by all the rest of the rich bozos stop the one Uber rich psycho.

Why would anyone not notice a million terminators being made before they were unleashed?

This isn't how anything works. No government cedes this kind of authority to anyone and trying to enforce it would lead to war even among allies.

Trying to give Iran nukes is pretty close to accompliss to mass murder. Iran is a terrorist state.

Anyone should reasonably be trying to negotiate to avoid loss of life but at the end of the day killing them may be the lesser of two evils from the perspective of the would be target.

Never heard of this happening to anyone whereas porch pirates are literally everywhere doesn't seem reasonable

They stole it explicitly because they thought they could get away with pretending someone else stole it from the door by photographing it by the door.. Nobody can steal it from inside a locker. It follows that they wouldn't have done it in that scenario. Also doordash basically hires everyone on planet earth. It hires some folks it doesn't even know its hired because they are obviously working on someone else's account.

The president of the US doesn't have their hand up the PM of Israel's ass. This is especially true of Biden who was known to be on his way out either way. We can withdraw support but its difficult for the US pres to do so unilaterally when Israel is politically popular on both side. Given the lack of power to make it stick such a phone call from Biden would have been ignored in favor of waiting for a change of regime.

Bullshit

You kid but voice recognition doesn't handle accents as well wherein accents is defined as anything other than what you hear on the news.

If someone calls 911 how on earth do you know its a non-emergency before speaking with someone?

It says that members will fight those who attack other members of the group. It doesn't have to say it specifically its blatantly obvious through a plain reading of the text. The absolute minimum action would be Greenlanders violently resisting and murdering soldiers. Denmark attacking the US to prevent the murder of their citizens and others providing financial support whilst dumping US dollars and sanctioning the US.

1 year in we have 5000 dead US soldiers and a cratered economy, our own citizens are calling military babykillers again, and are suing for peace not because they beat us militarily but because we ruined our own shit.

This statement is based on nothing.

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm

In a word no, membership in NATO isn't a shield against the rest of NATO

Also most people's actions are on the overall ALL small. Most people make no big ripples. Telling them to either change the world or do nothing is telling them to do nothing.

Ethics are a habit if you can't give up a tv show what can you do exactly