Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MI
Posts
0
Comments
871
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • There are many birthright citizens of all ages not just infants. They would instantly become homeless and destitute in a country where they may not speak the language and have no proof of citizenship even if they may eventually have some due to them eventually.

    Furthermore this is a vehicle to deny them other human rights by selectively removing people who are entitled by our constitution to citizenship for speaking against the government.

    Right of redress assembly speech to be secure in their person , and to be subject to the law not a ruler are all important rights herein denied.

  • If I own something I can put it to any lawful use without restriction or compensation. Neither taxation nor seizure for failure to pay taxes are anything like ownership.

    Your mental picture fails to encompass the nuance which indeed isn't particularly subtle.

  • Ability to seize isn't the act of seizure nor by that definition is any land owned because most everything has been taken by force at some point.

    Renting wouldn't change anything unless they got permission from the owner.

  • Human rights are those required for human dignity and flourishing not those which are universally possessed in a world full of distress and toil.

    Freedom of speech is one such commonly understood but often denied. For instance if the content of your speech can see someone removed from the land of their birth to one where they are stateless and homeless what other rights do they possess?