maxwells_daemon @ maxwells_daemon @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

62

Joined

3 mo. ago

"Developers" are the ones who are passionate about the games they make, and definitely don't want their games dead.

"Corporations" are the ones who only want to profit from selling the game, and then ditch it once it's no longer lucrative enough.

Lower the Z offset. Not by too much, or it'll scratch the bed.

"Everything is failing" is not useful info at all. Post a video of the failure happening if you don't know how to describe it.

Any videos of when the print fails? Is it all prints or just the Benchy? Does it always fail at the same height?

From the available info, I'd guess it got knocked off the bed because the nozzle hit the curled overhang, which indicates the first layer is too high, decreasing adhesion, and the fan is not blowing enough, so the overhangs don't cool enough, which allows them to curl upwards and get in the way of the nozzle.

More info = better diagnosis.

V for Vendetta missed the time frame by maybe a decade or two, not much more than that.

Yeah, fuck that town that elected a dog as the mayor, I guess?

Yes, I understood exactly what you said because, as I said before, it's not hard to understand, it's just badly formulated.

Natural science is amoral, a jaguar doesn't care that a gazelle is pregnant when hunting it, since neither of them know what morality is. Scientific research is not naturally moral or immoral, it's instance dependant. You wouldn't call Volta immoral for stacking zinc and copper to make a battery, and you wouldn't think twice before calling Unit 731 immoral.

You don't get to make a normative claim, wrap it in a false equivalence between human constructs, like scientific research and morality, and the moral independency of natural science, word it inches away from historical fascist research ideals, and then complain when people fill in the blanks in the most plausible way. If you wanted a real discussion, you could've developed, from the start, on what you mean, and worded it better. But you didn't, you're just rage baiting.

You could've said "science is unethical by nature", or "science is, by nature, unethical", with commas. Those would be well formulated sentences, which would be easier to read and make sense of.

About the questions: do you oppose all ethical guidelines in science? Are there any you're fond of? Or should science be completely unimpeded, regardless of who it damages, or what purpose it serves? Can you give any examples?

As I said, very questionable.

It's not hard to understand, despite being badly formulated, it's just very questionable.

systemd, the solution for all Linux issues.

Or so they said...

If you think religion is the only reason to be a good person, you need therapy.

It's one possible solution for one of the problems under the same umbrella. If you can't or don't want to run the servers for your online game (eg: Echo VR), just open source the server's code and let the community keep the game running.

Absolute fucking clown. He's just scared of open sourcing old games because everyone will see how shitty his code is...

Everyone said that about Wayland a decade ago...

Users move on from Windows because of old hardware compatibility, pick an easy to use distro, like Fedora. Fedora drops old hardware compatibility...

It's their second attempt in under a month. Red Hat needs to sit the fuck down.

Never enough alternatives

Nah, I don't get that here in Brazil

And now you're lost

Because I could pay privately for the services the government gives me, and it'd be cheaper and better.

Work minimum wage and be distracted from the fact we'll all be dead in under 3 decades. That's what the pedos in power want.

30°C air is hot as fuck, 30°C water is a perfect cold shower.