MaxMalRichtig @ maxmalrichtig @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

5

Comments

104

Joined

2 yr. ago

OK. Are we on the same page, that we need to abolish fossil energy ASAP?

And: How much (in % of global energy production) should be covered by nuclear power in your opinion?

No, I'm fine. But you go and have fun.

Do you really want to go to the store and buy a bottle of breast milk to pour over your cereal?

But... that is EXACTLY what people are doing?! 🤷 Maybe not from a human, but still from a mother.

Would you argue in the same way for slavery or child labour?

This is the only opinion an empathic human beeing should have. 👍

Of course you can. Because nuclear energy is NOT a solution. Especially not in the long run.

If you need some inspiration on existing boards: https://golem.hu/board/ --> set the filter on "ortholinear" for "matrix style" boards.

First you need to find a board, then we can help you to build it.

(You COULD build a board from scratch, but if you have not built a board yet, or have no background in mech. / electr. engineering, this me a bit too much at first.)

While the whole world is beeing like

Is it weird

No. You're fine.

VNC

1000 followers isn't really big. 🤷

Well put me in a dress and call me Sheryl. Never knew that the "accepted definitions" were really that close. Thanks!

I knew that some definitions of OSS were really basic (as in "as long as there is source at some point") but I didn't know that the OSI definition was so close to the idea of "free software".

I found the read about the history and similarities & differences quite interesting: https://web.archive.org/web/20180915200609/http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html

I think you got that one wrong.

Open source is not a license. Open source literally just means that the source is openly available. It does not include the right for you to reuse or change any of the source.

That's why most of the time, people are talking about "Free Open Source Software" (FOSS) when they think of openly licensed source code.

That's why you can publish your project on e.g. Github (= open source) but if you don't add a license statement, your work is still protected by an "all rights reserved copyright". (= not free)

Anyhow, I would not necessarily deem a project OSS, just because the used language is readable by default. To me, OSS needs at least the developers intention to make it openly available.

Thanks! You are right. "Swapping vs. replacing" is not the same usecase.

It will most likely come back due to EU legislation.

Mastodon HAS rss support.

Just add ".RSS" to your mastodon URL. This should work for accounts, tags and possibly for other feeds/streams.

https://derekkedziora.com/notes/20221112094802

Sounds awesome!

http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

"Am I a joke to you?"

Personally, I love Bludit as it is really simple, flat-file and perfect for blogging.

However, you could also look into WriteFreely if you want something with ActivityPub (= Fediverse). Feature wise very very plain and simple, but might noch give you most of the bells and whistles as other platforms would do it. Think of it as an alternative to "Medium".