Skip Navigation

User banner
Sergey Kozharinov
Sergey Kozharinov @ master @lem.serkozh.me
Posts
1
Comments
15
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Windows: "We dropped support for that thing you bought brand new 5 years ago"

    Linux: "We are considering dropping support for something that has existed for longer than you had"

  • This license grants individuals the freedom to review, modify, and utilize the code for personal, academic, scientific, research, and development purposes. However, for commercial use, consent from the Any Association is required.

    Here, it isn't open source.

  • Just don't switch to "all", that's it. Pretty much any platform that has more than 1.5 users and allows any political discussions is doomed to be filled with extreme politics

  • ok, my age is NULL

  • It doesn't make a lot of sense for LetsEncrypt to spend time adding support for such certs, since both a domain name and a cert from another CA are cheaper than buying an IPv4 block

  • certificates can only be obtained for domain names

    That is not true, nothing prevents it on the technical side, and even some trusted CAs sell them under certain conditions

  • you can also accomplish that by turning off city's electrical grid

  • You can't read documentation if there is no documentation

  • Not until there is a massive data breach that leads to very serious and obvious real world consequences

  • I switched from GNOME 3 a long time ago, and emulating GNOME's workflow would be the last thing I would want

  • Linux @lemmy.ml

    Keeping Open Source Open | Rocky Linux

  • Inaccurate, this error fits on one screen

  • those who do not want to pay for the time, effort and resources going into RHEL

    Standard RHEL server subscription costs 800$/year, a ridiculous price for an individual to pay (yeah I know it's called Enterprise Linux, but still)


    those who want to repackage it for their own profit

    Funny considering that AlmaLinux OS Foundation is a non-profit


    The developer subscription provides no-cost RHEL to developers and enables usage for up to 16 systems, again, at no-cost

    Until RedHat decides to pull the rug, just like it already did with CentOS

    Also:

    The first thing to understand is that you cannot renew your no-cost Red Hat Developer Subscription for individuals after the first year. Unlike a paid subscription, the no-cost edition for developers is limited to one year.

    So, what's a developer to do? Fortunately, that's easy: You can just register again. Yes, it's that simple. Once your developer subscription expires, simply re-register and get a new, no-cost subscription. Note that you must wait until your current subscription expires before you can renew it.

    From: https://developers.redhat.com/articles/renew-your-red-hat-developer-program-subscription


    Simply rebuilding code, without adding value or changing it in any way

    Yeah, I think setting up build and distribution infrastructure is not adding any value

  • so they can’t bork their system

    not tech savy people: you underestimate my power

  • So basically centralized cenzorship for decentralized Fediverse?

  • The check $LEMMY_HOSTNAME == http* will give a false positive if (for whatever reason) the domain name starts with http