magnusrufus @ magnusrufus @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

239

Joined

2 yr. ago

Are you trying to say that American exceptionalism wasn't a big thing for decades? Cause that's not true. Are you trying to say that not every American engaged in it? Cause that's not a useful point.

When its in response to Americans I'd say it's probably influenced by having to put up with our decades of espousing american exceptionalism and our tendency to not care to learn it respect the traditions and cultural norms of the places we visit. It's probably not the best behavior but it's kinda understandable why they might have specific negativity towards the people that have spent so long loudly proclaiming how great they are.

So dang euro you don't even want ice in your ice.

They are saying that the hypothetical proposed by op is something they dream of.

I love foundry but "a bit more" is a wild understatement.

Never underestimate the stupidity of a conservative regardless of their heritage.

The verbage of those warnings is on par with “this is unhealthy if you do this” not “this is potentially lethal if you do this”. So again, honestly, how is it as stupid as drinking bleach?

Listing the reason why they have those warnings seems pretty reasonable. That way kids could know that it's not "some nanny state bs". The verbage of those warnings is on par with "this is unhealthy if you do this" not "this is potentially lethal if you do this". So again, honestly, how is it as stupid as drinking bleach?

Honestly you think keep out of reach of children on a food item is the same level of warning as not drinking bleach?

And which of those so you honestly think puts it on par with driving bleach?

Warnings of what? Which warning would have made risk clear? Death imagery is part of their marketing not a legitimate warning. The kid eating a commercially sold food item is not on the same level as drinking bleach. It's weirdly cold and callous victim blaming to say that he was so stupid that he would inevitably die in some similar way. It rings the same as the people that scoff at the McDonalds coffee thing. Yeah you shouldn't ban hot coffee but you probably should ban serving coffee hot enough to cause third degree burns.

You can't ban spicy food but this kid should have known it would kill him. Good take...

Unfortunately that's significant element of that niche culture. Pushing your limit and proving just how spicy you can go is the point for most of them.

A significant portion of the right doesn't even respect their humanity, respecting their sovereignty is going to be a tough one.

What do you think viable alternative and financially stable mean? Your responses seem to imply that you are asking if there is a bigger player other than YouTube which you know there isn't. Did you want to hear about the alternatives or did you just want to complain about YouTube?

If that's your reply when someone mentions a decently sized and recognizable alternative then why are you asking your original question?

I knew it would be Lazerpig even before clicking. You're doing good work looking that.

It wouldn't be free market then.

Well, yes.

And in your estimation how much should angry men be allowed to touch you?