library_napper @ library_napper @monyet.cc

Posts

6

Comments

1,049

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yes, thank you :)

My point is you shouldn't make assumptions. Just because you can't track all of my activity doesn't mean I'm a bot.

Nepal has banned all pornographic sites in 2018.

Hahahahaha, no. I was in Nepal and definitely watched porn. The censor must have been terrible because I didn't even know it existed.

So, yeah, tiktok won't be banned then.

Good opportunity for Nepali entrepreneurs to make a Nepali clone. Does one already exist?

That's the same with any copyleft project though. and we could just fork it if that happened

I did, but the article doesn't load. Unless OP posts NYT articles in the comments, then all some of us can do is guess..

NYT doesn't load without JS. Please paste article in the comments.

You dont know that tho. I have multiple lemmmy accounts. Most if them are anonymous, but when I post my own content, I use my real name.

The only thing I use my "real name" Lemmy account for is self - promotion, but that doesn't mean I dont participate with other accounts.

Folks have the right to anonymity.

Is there any GDPR like entity for greenwashing in the EU? Would love to see them get fined hundreds of millions of euros or 10% of their revenue, whichever is higher

And after your teaching them the difference? How many could differentiate then?

But wouldn't the reasonable conclusion at least be "wow these are big words and it says scientists wrote it; must be more trustworthy"

This. It depends on the source. Always consider the source.

Even a video essay can be credible, if they cite their sources

Complerly agreed, except that YouTube has privacy issues if you know how to protect yourself.

One of the reasons I love YouTube is that there's no authwall, and there's tons of alternative front ends... So it's completely anonymous

There are folks on YouTube that cite their sources. Don't ban the platform just because many of the uses suck.

Some would argue it's more accessible in video format. Personally I think it's best to write an article and then do a breif video summary that links to the article "for more info"

The only reason advertising was banned on reddit was so they could monetize. If the content is relevant to the community, I don't care if the person sharing it created it. I appreciate the submission.

Let the votes decide the quality of the content.

They are not condemning Israel for the current assault on Gaza. They are condemning Israel for the settlements (which is a blatant war crime that has long been criticized by every country except Israel and the US iirc.

The settlements have always been recognized as illegal, but I guess its good to reaffirm it.

Its a war crime to move a civilian population into a military occupied region. This crime has been ongoing for decades.

You dont. We do.

Citing it helps people understand the historical context when learning about what's actually going on there