Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LE
Posts
0
Comments
591
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • Code is a language that can describe all sorts of systems, some of those systems have rigid hierarchies and some of those systems are distributed.

    Software development teams also tend to work in collaborative ways, as much as Agile and Scrum development practices are bastardized in many large companies the core philosophies are very worker-empowering.

    In the cases where companies use "waterfall" or misuse Agile the culprit seems to be managerial interference or very rigid and important requirements (e.g. a plane software system that must not fail)

    I see your point, but per the above I would say it's not universal and I would also counter that software architects have very open-ended solutions to choose from and are used to thinking about a system as a whole, which in my case at least leads me to questioning how our political and social systems can change for the better.

  • You're reaching deep into your grab bag of labels. Am I gaslighting you now?

    I commented my opinion on the original post and then I employed sarcasm when you accused me of gatekeeping.

    My reaction to this thread being all about movie references was to wish we didn't think about our society only in those terms and I shared it.

  • That's not even the point. This is the same "Jagmeet has a watch"bullshit. Being a party leader level career politician means you're likely in a position of privilege. A single mom with 2 kids isn't gonna be it. That's how the system is set up. I'd rather a rich ally than a rich enemy.

  • It's what conservative voters respond to. No ideas, just feelings about how things are bad. Actually learning about why things are the way they are and what needs to change is too hard, and less comforting than feeling like they're special and others are the ones keeping them down.

  • Yes that's another really good point. Any sort of foreign support from Russia or China or Europe that brings weapons in would mean a permanent thorn in their side, Canada wouldn't see peace for decades, if at all. Similar to the quagmire in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    That's in addition to how easily we could strike at their home territory in cross border raids, which will be even more unacceptable domestically.