So the transcript is incorrect. I just listened to the audio to confirm. He did not say "The job of the U.S. armed forces is not to host drag shows, to transform foreign cultures, but to spread democracy to everybody around the world at the point of a gun". He said ""The job of the U.S. armed forces is not to host drag shows, to transform foreign cultures, or to spread democracy to everybody around the world at the point of a gun". It entirely changes the meaning of that sentence. Fuck Trump, but let's make sure that information is correct before jumping on it.
Alright, yes, the Justice system is clearly overreacting to one type of murder over the other, yes. But, just for clarity, those armed guards are not there to maintain control of Luigi like he is a super villain that could take down 10 men with his bare hands. And they are not just there to send a message to the public (although it can't be ruled out that there may be a conscious component of that going on). But they are there because his incarceration is high profile with a lot of supporters who might wish to attack the guards to free him AND a lot of people who might wish to hurt him becuase of the political symbol he has become. It could definitely be argued that the other guy should be as big of a deal, but he just isn't as high profile, so the risk is way lower there.
And several people die from it each year. The chicken is meant to be sterile and safe. Chicken can be sushi grade like fish can be. But cross contamination, careless handling or use of non-sushi grade meat can make it extremely dangerous. I really can't stress enough that IF you were going to try it, you should only do so at a very high quality restaurant with an experienced chef, and even then, you should be very very careful.
Wait, is congress trying to dictate state and local tax policy? Why? And how would that be allowed. They have power over federal taxes and interstate commerce, not internal tax policies for each state.
Yeah, I'm all for reminding Red States that they are dependent on Blue states when they talk about secession (cuz FAFO), but this is not an imbalance that needs fixed. Like individual costs can be wasteful spending, but wealthier states taking care of poorer states or safer state paying for disaster relief in more vulnerable states is just good sense and how a unified nation should be. It's the same reason wealthy individuals should be more responsible for taking care of the less wealthy or poor individuals too. This is not a game of "fuck you, got mine." We should not be encouraging the hoarding of wealth when others are in need, whether individuals or states. There are plenty of reasons to be angry with red states, but their geography or poverty (the actual poverty itself, not the policies that contribute to it) are not those reasons.
What difference does most of that make? Sharing a room with others, sure. But I don't walk around the house hanging dong just because I sleep in the buff. I put on some pj pants and a shirt, at minimum, to leave the room. My roommates have never cared what i slept in as long as it didn't flash them on the way to the bathroom in the middle of the night.
My wife and I have our own room. I have a door, it is shut at night while I'm asleep and doesn't open again until I get dressed in the morning. If you open it in that time and see penis and scrote or hairy ass cheeks, that's on you. I don't care if you're a roommate asking me a question, a 6 year old that had a nightmare, or a fireman saving my life. You know what you risked when you turned the knob. If you give me a second of heads up or wake me and then wait for a sec, I'll put on something. But I'm not sleeping in twisted up boxers with sweaty nuts sticking to my legs to make life more comfortable and convenient for everyone else in the house.
Raising prices is literally the point of tariffs. If the prices don't go up, they serve no purpose, whether that is to encourage the purchase of alternative products or to farm money from tariff fees (because if the company can't raise prices they just won't sell tariffed items). Dumb. Dumb dumb.
Bet you a buffalo nickel that before the end of his tenure, he's going to expand the court with ultra-loyalists, all but completely open about how they will ignore the law or always interpret it in the way that gives Trump what he wants.
Its the min value of the input params, or Infinity.
And the reason it's Infinity If there is no input, for better or worse, under the hood the method is assigning a variable, min, the highest value possible and then comparing it to each element in the list, reassigning it when it encounters an element lower than its value at the time. So it will obviously always be reassigned if there are any elements at all (if they're less than Infinity, I guess). But if there are no elements, it's never reassigned, and thus returns Infinity. It could have just signed min to the first element instead if Infinity, but that would lead to a runtime error when min was run without a function. If you're not going to throw a runtime error though, it makes sense for min to return Infinity because, what other number could you return that couldn't actually be the minimum
That's fair. I'm sure it's more the concern for someone attacking them than him