To me, it's the same feeling as the teachers that wouldn't accept papers written on a computer (after an age where we know how to write) because "it's less honest".
I'm not good at drawing. I would love to try to make a game. Anti-AI luddites are happy that I will never produce something because I am incabable of doing something that an AI could easily accomplish.
That it's an entirely subjective experience and to presume that someone's enjoyment of it means that a human had to be involved in It's creation is such a ridiculous response.
Have you ever seen the paintings that one chimpanzee made? They're actually pretty nice in composition. Am I allowed to like the way they look even if no human made them?
But why? I feel like people are twisting their arguments against AI. Or they are being twisted against.
Why does an actor care where there lines come from? We live in a world where The Room was written and released, but AI content is going to be the end of media? People aren't that special. Our thoights aren't that special. We don't have souls. We're just thinking machines, and nothing we create is more unique than something that we created creates.
I'm fine with AI content. It's going to make making media so much easier for people who aren't inherently artistic but have a vision they want to show.
"An account was already created for them" because it's the same Meta account. You can just follow people when you start your account without them necessarily activating threads.
It's a great strategy when you can't sweat. Animals roll in mud to keep the sun off and for evaporative cooling. I forget, but I'm pretty sure kangaroos rub their spit into their fur for the same effect.
What? Nuclear retaliation is the threat. It's a legitimate one. Plus, after NATO scrubs Russia and its allies off the map, who takes over their country or nuclear arsenal?
I can absolutely understand having medically recognized allergies be an acceptable reason to refuse the service.
A fear of dogs doesn't cut it for me. A fear of black people doesn't mean you get to refuse service to them. A person has a right to have their service dog with them.
The child is called xAI, Elon has never thought about the idea that other people have life and intelligence, he's going to explore the true nature of the universe by actually caring about his new kid.
To me, it's the same feeling as the teachers that wouldn't accept papers written on a computer (after an age where we know how to write) because "it's less honest".
I'm not good at drawing. I would love to try to make a game. Anti-AI luddites are happy that I will never produce something because I am incabable of doing something that an AI could easily accomplish.