This problem becomes even more asinine when you consider that the whole point of the Return to Office drive is the "Magic Hallway Conversation" that happens during those informal break time periods.
Just finished playing Axiom Verge. Since I picked up a SteamDeck, I'm trying to play through my library. I'm trying to figure out which game in my library to tackle next between Blasphemous, Forager, or Spiritfarer.
It's tolerated because he's literally the best player in his position in the entire world (and one of the best in the history of the entire sport). What are the going to do? Get rid of him?
If you're not one of the best, the behavior is not tolerated as much.
I guess that since Epic owns Unreal Engine that bad news for Epic means good news for Godot?
I don't think that Epic is going to want to divest from Unreal considering how much money it makes.
I also don't think that it's a zero-sum game. As a developer I want Unreal (and Unity) to be great so it creates more competition. Unreal has led the way in a lot of cool gaming tech that Godot is picking up.
My main issue with using the general chatbot is that it's an incredibly inefficient way to convey information. For writing tasks I essentially need to type most of the answer first to get reasonable outputs when considering my actual constraints.
More specialized tooling will have these constraints built-in, which will increase productivity.
Even if we have the perfect general chatbot, it's still a lot of work to concisely describe your requirements to it.
It's a computer vulnerability or exploit which has not been discovered before (or at least the software developer wasn't aware of it).
0-day comes from the number of days the software developers have been informed of the vulnerability. Normally security researchers will tell a company about an exploit and give them some time to fix it before telling the public.
I totally agree. I always think it's weird when they have interviews or podcasts about talking to CEOs and they all say something like "you just have to work hard enough". Yeah. Okay.
Where are the podcasts where they ask lottery winners for some vapid aphorism about hard work paying off?
I don't understand. Isn't the way not to be suspected of perjury just not to lie to the court in the first place? It doesn't seem like extortion to me.
I think this was due to the conflict of interest by the old lawyer, who probably told this witness, "Just say you didn't see anything or don't remember and you'll be fine."
It turned out it wasn't fine and the guy found a new lawyer. This new lawyer is being a zealous advocate and trying to keep this guy out of jail.
This problem becomes even more asinine when you consider that the whole point of the Return to Office drive is the "Magic Hallway Conversation" that happens during those informal break time periods.