Skip Navigation

kennydidwhat
kennydidwhat @ kennydidwhat @lemmy.world
Posts
1
Comments
9
Joined
2 yr. ago

MMALeft - A place for all 3 of the left-leaning MMA fans to poke fun at conservatives in the sport.

Jump

  • Hey! I'll have you know that at least one out of every hundred fights looks vaguely like a boxing match!

    • Putin in Awkward Position After Leak of Wagner Document

    Jump

  • Yeah, also they're sourcing from ISW. Which is fine, if proper considerations are made.

    But, they were not. Really low-hanging fruit of an article imo.

    • New Communities @lemmy.world
    kennydidwhat @lemmy.world

    MMALeft - A place for all 3 of the left-leaning MMA fans to poke fun at conservatives in the sport.

    Marijuana in the military? A push in Congress would loosen cannabis rules, ease recruitment crisis

    Jump

  • The VA is a broken program. Where's the lie? When did I mention civilian healthcare?

    You wouldn't have to strawman me if you had a meaningful point.

    • Marijuana in the military? A push in Congress would loosen cannabis rules, ease recruitment crisis

    Jump

  • Calling the VA socialized medicine is correct.

    It is also incorrect. Because it is a broken program.

    • YSK: Your Lemmy activities (e.g. downvotes) are far from private

    Jump

  • Is this sarcasm?

    The DMV is government-regulated and has a legal duty to safeguard your data. Unlike the corporations we were happily discussing before you decided to try out as Ben Shapiro.

    • YSK: Your Lemmy activities (e.g. downvotes) are far from private

    Jump

  • That is the entire (and only) point I was making. x)

    • YSK: Your Lemmy activities (e.g. downvotes) are far from private

    Jump

  • On the contrary, I'm not conflating two specifics. I'm speaking in general terms about the demonstrable public perception (read: billions of social media users who happily hand over their data vs. the palpable unease over data publication in all walks of tech discussion) and how it is innately hypocritical.

    It is perfectly normal and useful to discuss societal contradictions. For example: "We hate school shootings, but we do fuck-all to stop them from occurring." That statement does not conflate two different vocal minorities, it purports to accurately describe the generalized societal contradiction at hand.

    The rest of your post is completely off-topic.

    • YSK: Your Lemmy activities (e.g. downvotes) are far from private

    Jump

  • Why? The masses have no issue forking data over to big tech. What difference does it make if it's one or a million corporations using that data when it's being sold willy-nilly to anybody with a checkbook?

    The point is not how many actors have access to your data. The point is that in both scenarios (public data vs. single-corporation-controlled data), your data is pragmatically public from data sales, data leaks, and so on. However, in only one of them, your data is ostensibly "protected" by a corporation - the lie at hand. In the other scenario, you are under no spell that your data is protected or private - the truth.

    My comment was simply pointing out how they're effectively the same thing. Giving your data to a big tech firm is effectively the same thing as making it public. Hence, the outrage over one not matching the outrage over the other is amusing to me because it implies how effective the corpo framing of this issue is.

    • YSK: Your Lemmy activities (e.g. downvotes) are far from private

    Jump

  • There's something amusing about people feeling violated by their activity being made public, but not necessarily by corporations hoarding and capitalizing on that activity & data. I mean, one of them is out in the open. The other is pure abuse.