Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)KA
Posts
2
Comments
59
Joined
2 yr. ago

Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

Can you recommend me some independent artists?

  • Im pretty sure the objective is not to get contributions. You talk like contributions could actually replace actual full time maintainers of the software. They cannot. If a payment of corpB is large enough to completely buy out the software, then the objective is completed in the sense that this should provide enough money to maintain the software by paying maintainers or even hiring new ones, there is no need to beg for corpo contributions then.

    The objective is not to make the most community friendly licence, it is to pay the people who do the actual work.

  • Cuba seems to be a great country, people there most definitely have great lives. Freedom_of_the_press_in_Cuba Elections in cuba

    Laos has been governed by the Lao People's Revolutionary Party, under which non-governmental organisations have routinely characterised the country's human rights record as poor, citing repeated abuses such as torture, restrictions on civil liberties and persecution of minorities.

    laos

    human rights vietnam

    DPRK = north korea

    Sure are great countries you listed there...

    For the record i dont want to doubt that marxism would be a nice experience but the lack of non ass, real countries makes me do so

    If its so much better there how come you dont live there?

  • I agree that extensibility would be nice, but it cant / shouldnt replace the actually working software with all working features. Ive never been able to get into modal editors before helix because vim / neovim (probably kakoune also) are unusable in their base form by modern standards. Any actual config / distribution needs tons of work to integrate basic usability features and fall apart in a blink (and are usually not very performant - lazy loading exists for a reason). Therefore i think its the right move to focus on implementing a fully featured editor first and then explore extensibility. That said i will also be very happy when it becomes a thing, no matter if it will be via webassembly, lisp, ect...

  • I'd recommend not trying to learn all the shortcuts as it's most likely wasted effort. Most people probably dont know the entirety of available moves. Learn the basics to use the editor like, h j k l e w t f g s and start using it. Then whenever you need a ton of keystrokes to get something done, step back and see if there are moves which simplify that. Multiple selections / cursors are also an integral part of using helix so make sure to use em when applicable.

    As a sidenote helix isnt very modular imo. The appeal is that compared to e.g. neovim, it is very much a Monolith with most things you need built in which simplifies usage / configuration greatly.

    I'll admit that this learning by doing way is prone to adopting half assed solutions but its the only way i know to get comfortable with something quickly

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Anyone Relate ?

  • ... modern ... Object oriented

    wat?

    Bro that shits like 30 years old and most langs released after lets say 2010 have put that stuff in the backseat for backwards compatibility. Anyway I get your point

    operate any arbitrary interface

    Dont believe it. Behold the shittyness of modern UI

  • Firefox. Read the new statements on their website and the Full diff of the pull request. Not concerned at all.

    Edit: pumped for ladybird, but its gonna be a few years until that is finished