I know it's a joke, but that's almost certainly not going to be the case. Pathogenic bacteria have fundamentally different metabolism and genes.
What is more likely is either: ecological imbalance or the bacteria only metabolises the harmful chemicals under extreme deprivation of other carbon sources, which is never realistic, so they never do
True, but Mac users are the least flexible computer users of all time.
Apple changes two pixels in an icon or introduces a new default window snapping size and the hosts of ATP record a 5 hour long podcast episode abou this ruined the world and permanently broke their workflow.
But sometimes there is value in teaching the old tools/frameworks for doing something. For instance, in bioinformatics, I prefer students that can explain what the FASTA format is versus just boinking the pretty GUI button on the proprietary format used by their sequencer.
Not really, this was the paradigm on Mac for ages. That's also why there are three different ways for a Mac app to "become fullscreen" and they have different behavior, because they kept patching on top of the default workflow
Also, we know Microsoft will eventually do something to mess this all up.
Even if they change absolutely nothing, Windows on a handheld is an infuriating experience, which is saying a lot, because the desktop version isn't very good either.
I'm incredibly sad for both the fact that you believe that in any way you had a funny "punchline" or "joke" in there, and for the lack of general snake facts posted here
There's no need to be such an ass when it's a super valid question about compared anatomy. And indeed, that user is correct: "what diaphragm?" snakes do not have one, they rely on large smooth muscle between the ribs.
It's a literal job requirement. If you're smart, you're not going to blindly follow orders. Police cognitive testing literally discards candidates that perform well in intellectual tasks. This is not a conspiracy or a joke, it's how police works.
The Steam Deck community is super weird about that.
They ferociously defended, for two years, a person who developed a GUI placebo. A Valve developer confirmed it did nothing. Tests showed it did nothing. But you'd be downvoted and even banned for pointing that out.
Then the same person popularized another placebo - again with AMD documentation proving it didn't work - and once again people loved it.
Decky plugins follow the same logic. Random Reddit users bodging together some abomination of code to claim those sweet upvotes. One very popular plugin, "Is There Any Deal" causes such a massive constant CPU spike you lose 10 FPS on many games.
Its nuts. And Decky breaks itself every other update anyway, for months people blamed Valve for sleep issues that surprise surprise were actually Decky failing to wake up gracefully and taking the entire UI hostage with it.
Reddit/Lemmy don't have to be a monolith to have a clearly defined and easily seen accepted narrative.
Posts and comments that considered frame generation viable when Nvidia was the only one with the technology were massively downvoted and got absurd replies, universally. Even more so here on Lemmy.
Now the Steam Deck subreddit is dominated by posts about Lossless Scaling and users claiming they can't see any artifacts or latency at all. When AMD introduced their, quite objectively inferior, implementation of frame generation Lemmy immediately shifted tone. I can go to any random thread and say "I think FSR frame generation is great!" and nobody bats an eye. A shift in overall tone is quite easy to see and measure, regardless if the website is not written by a single individual.
There are proof of concept demos of running custom code on it, but that's always true on any console, especially those with browsers. There's no current method for truly running software using all hardware resources, nor bypassing the signature checks to pirate games.
My reply followed the thread just fine. Your last reply to me didn't match my comment branch, only the first by somebody else.
It's not hard, I don't understand what you're expecting from this conversation.