This might not be the most popular take, but IMO the fuss about Fedora's (proposed) telemetry is way overblown. By all accounts, it seems intended to help the dev team improve OS performance and will still preserve user privacy.
People tend to lump all telemetry together but Fedora's implementation would be significantly less concerning than that which users of Android, Windows and Apple OSs currently put up with on a daily basis.
Tbh I thought the admins of Lemmy.World were being overzealous when they preemptively defederated from HexBear before we even had a chance to see what federating with them would be like, but from where it stands now I think they made the right call. It doesn't seem like anything of value was lost.
Despite apparent assurances from the HB admin team that their users are to be on their best behavior outside of their echo chamber, it seems they just can't help themselves.
Thunars split view. I get tired by the Gnome developers, who removed this feature from Nautilus, explain that two Nautilus windows side by side are equivalent to a split view. It is not
I think the intended usage in Nautilus is to use tabs, not to have two windows side-by-side.
Personally, I find tabs preferable to a split-view.
It is definitely better since Bookworm, but it's still not great.
The default installation .iso is a netinstall that uses Debian's creaky old installer that looks like a text-based RPG from the 1980s when compared to a modern GUI Linux installer.
The live images, which are the best for new users because they do use a modern and user-friendly installer (Calamares) and allow pre-selection of the desktop environment, are still hidden away by needing to click through two more web pages to get to the list of isos, without any explanation of the different DEs or recommendations for new users.
It's like they thought to themselves "we need to make it easier for new users, but we don't want to make it too easy".
The term is open to interpretation, but it certainly doesn't simply refer to non-christians.
Some interpretations view the antichrist as a specific individual or figure who opposes Christ in some hypothetical, end of days type situation, while others see it as a broader symbolic representation of a certain figure or person that represents the complete opposite of Christ's teachings or the spirit of Christianity.
"Anti" can mean "opposite" just as much as it can mean "against".
American are just as bad. A similar thing happened to my wife last month.
She and a bunch of other passengers missed their connecting flights due to the airline's incompetence. She stood in line for four hours, without food or water, to wait her turn for American to get her on another flight but as she neared the end of the line the staff closed up their desks and said "sorry folks, come back tomorrow" and walked off, leaving her and about 50 other people to basically sleep on the floor and wait for them to re-open five hours later.
No mention of finding them a place to stay, nor providing even a bite to eat. Zip. Nada.
While it's not quite as bad as what these poor people went through, it's the same "not my problem; sucks to be you" energy from the airline.
Have you read the admin's explanation post? They cited posts from HexBear admins which suggested they were intending to stir things up on other instances after federation.
Again, I don't necessarily agree with the decision, but either way it seems to not be about political ideology as much as keeping out unpleasant behavior.
from my perspective it very much appears like it's along ideological lines.
I wouldn't say so at all. The admins took action to defederate from the alt-right explodingheads.com instance because the content there broke the servers rules here, and they made a similar judgment with HexBear because of their apparent intention to brigade.
While the decision to defederate from HB was arguably premature, the admins here do at least seem more concerned with protecting their users than they are with deplatforming specific political stances.
The format actually has a lot of benefits - it supports transparency, animation, and compresses very efficiently. So it could theoretically replace GIF, JPG, and PNG in one fell swoop.
The downsides are that many apps don't currently support it and that it's owned by Google.
Personally I use webp for images that are not intended to share (e.g. banners and images on my blog), but stick to JPG/PNG for sending to other people.
Because modern cinema is saturated with CGI, to the point where audiences are becoming desensitized to it. Unless it's done really well, it also tends to feel less realistic than practical effects.
Being able to actually create a real representation of a nuclear explosion and filming it, rather than just shooting in front of green screen and adding it in post-production, takes a lot more dedication and skill.
Kabe @ kabe @lemmy.world Posts 2Comments 143Joined 2 yr. ago
I'm not familiar with your last point - what analytics does it skew and how?