Posting AI slop ruins the "social" part of social media. You're not reading real human thoughts anymore, just statistically plausible words.
Same with machine-generated "art". What's the point?
AI companies are leeches; they steal work for the purpose of undercutting the original creators with derivative content.
Vibe coders produce utter garbage that nobody, especially not themselves understands, and somehow are smug about it.
A lot of AI stuff is a useless waste of resources.
Most of the hate is justified IMO, but a couple weeks ago I died on the hill arguing that an LLM can be useful as a code documentation search engine. Once the train started, even a reply that thought software libraries contain books got upvotes.
You're making it sound a lot harder and more painful than it is. Do you also judge people who ride 2-wheeled vehicles that "require attention" for staying balanced?
"I don't like X, therefore people who like X can't possibly like it for real and must be pretending. In fact, they are elitists who only do it to feel superior to me."
The worst I've got so far hasn't been hallucinated "books", but stuff like functions from a previous major version of the api mixed in.
I'm most of the time on the opposite side of the AI arguments, but I don't think it's unreasonable to use an LLM as a documentation search engine. The article itself also points out copilot's usefulness for similar things, but seems the opinion lost the popular vote here.
Yeah, I guess that can happen. For me, it has saved much more time than it has wasted, but I've only used it on relatively popular libraries with stable apis, and don't ask for complex things.
I too take hate shits on the toilet.