If you use LLMs, you should use it primarily in ways where it's easier to confirm the output is valid than it is to create the output yourself. For instance, "what API call in this poorly-documented system performs
<some task>
?"
There is no consistent definition of AI so you might as well drop the quotation marks, lest you be prescriptivist.
That's just how war is though. War is always justified by the enemy. I'm not saying it's sad that they choose to defend themselves -- it's sad that they're in a situation where they must.
Yeah I mean all that is basically true -- for code. The tools work, if you know how to work them.
Of course, is this going to put programmers out of work? yes. Is it profitable for the same companies that are causing unemployment in other fields? Yes. So like, it's not as though there isn't blood on your hands.
Bad headline. They are advocating for killing her. They are not threatening to kill her because most of the people mentioned do not have the power to do so. I could threaten to arrest Netenyahu but it would not be a credible threat because that's not within my power at all. But I can post online in favour of the idea.
Right, but "most" is not "monolith." There's around 16 million jews worldwide, so even if 90% of jews are pro-zionist that's still over a million non-zionist jews. List of Jewish anti-Zionist organizations. Generalizations about groups of people are harmful even if they're true, because it's unfair to the those who don't fit the generalization.
My Occam's Razor is, "problems are hard." Besides, if you believe the US empire is failing overall, that doesn't seem compatible with every individual system within it operating as intended despite appearing to be failing by all observable metrics.
You can't print money to pay for everything. Who's going to accept that money in exchange for goods and services? Aquaman? If somebody told you that the government can print money forever, they were lying (or at least had never heard of Zimbabwe).
Perhaps we can split "purpose" into "intended purpose" and "emergent purpose," that is, the purpose that can be derived retroarctively from observing its function and modelling the system as an agent unto itself. For instance, I think you're conflating the intended purpose of the War on Drugs with its emergent purpose -- can you really deny that it was created with the intention of obliterating drugs? Seems conspiratorial to me, given the breadth of support the program had. But I could say that its emergent purpose became incarcerating black people due to flawed design and lack of oversight. And of course, this flawed design and lack of oversight was permitted to exist due to institutional racism in the meta layer (society and the government overall).
Fair enough about America and Canada. Still, I think the Israeli are perfectly aware that they could become part of Palestine. They just don't seem to want that. Honestly, trying to convince the Israeli people to go for this option seems rather Liberal-minded to me -- liberal democracy! Just vote!
"river to the sea"
RttS is a prediction, or a call to action. It is a slogan used by both sides, to mean freedom in one case or manifest destiny in the other.
If you use LLMs, you should use it primarily in ways where it's easier to confirm the output is valid than it is to create the output yourself. For instance, "what API call in this poorly-documented system performs
<some task>
?"There is no consistent definition of AI so you might as well drop the quotation marks, lest you be prescriptivist.