Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JO
Posts
3
Comments
271
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • "Quien te dió vela en este entierro?", en Argentina. Se puede asumir que es algo de hispanoamerica al menos. Also, maybe it's better to translate it like "you don't have a candle in this funeral" maybe? I don't know if english speaking people hold a vigil for the dead like we do. Burial while is a more direct translation, I don't think it really represents the spirit of the adage.

  • Eh, I get you, but the guy is my lead, and I'm a senior member. There is a bit of office politics involved here. My corporate-fu is not that good. Also there is a push to use AI tools from the top of the chain of command. I hate this, so much, but I need bring it in a more casual and friendly conversation.

  • The tech lead at my team started using AI to do code reviews he can't be bothered to properly do himself. His suggestions during reviews are now shit. I hate the future. I'm seriously thinking on taking a leadership position just because how much I hate this dynamic, to shield others and discourage AI usage from a higher ground.

  • Great summary. I would add not using LLMs to learn something new. As OP mentioned, when you know your stuff, you are aware of how much it bullshits. What happens when you don't know? You eat all the bullshit because it sounds good. Or you will end up with a vibed codebase you can't fully understand because you didn't reason to produce it. It's like driving a car and having a shitty copilot that sometimes hallucinates roads, and if you don't know where you are supposed to be, wherever that copilot takes you would look good. You lack the context to judge the results or advice.

    I basically use it now days as a semantic search engine of documentation. Talking with documentation is the coolest. If the response doesn't come with a doc link, it's probably not worth it. Make it point to the human input, make it help you find things you don't know the name of, but never trust the output without judging. In my experience, making it generate code that you end up correcting it's more cognitive heavy load than to write it yourself from scratch.

  • What name do you have for the activity of making money using someone else work or data, without their consent or giving compensation? If the tech was just tech, it wouldn't need any non consenting human input for it to work properly. This are just companies feeding on various types of data, if justice doesn't protects an author, what do you think it would happen if these same models started feeding of user data instead? Tech is good, ethics are not

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Tradition rule

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rulebaby

    Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    The "i" in Linux and Linus have different pronunciations even when they shouldn't.