Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JO
Posts
0
Comments
3,267
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • That's standard Republican strategy. A lot of the cases that ended up in front of the Supreme Court are straight up manufactured. In the case of the lady who refused to create a website for a gay wedding, they contacted the guy who supposedly made the request and he'd never heard of it before. Republican operatives basically looked up a gay guy in San Francisco and used his details in the website's contact form.

    Despite all that, the courts happily took the case and ruled on a complete fiction. Same thing happened in the case of the coach that forced his football team to pray.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Sure, everyone else is wrong, and you're right even when you're seemingly deliberately misreading everything. If you're not trolling, you should probably get yourself checked.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Which wasn't the case before the invasion, when there were 0 US troops. Why the fuck do you bring up current day when I'm talking about protests that happened over 20 years ago (by people who knew the current outcome was likely)?

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • And the number there should be is 0, I'm really not sure what point you're trying to make here. People didn't want a war in Iraq in 2003, there were mass peaceful protests, and yet it still happened.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The USA actually still had troops in Iraq, Syria, Jordan, etc. And the protests were to prevent an invasion from happening in the first place, not to go in, kill a million people and then 2 decades down the line throw up your hands and say 'that was a mistake' with no consequences for anyone that pushed for it.

  • I wasn't talking about the Supreme Court. The people should be holding a constitutional convention.

    The right already has a plan to do that, the people should have their own plan to counter it / take it over.

    And actually a big part of the issue is the Supreme Court intentionally misinterpreting the letter and spirit of the constitution. The first, second and fourth amendments were fine the way they were, the Supreme Court just chipped away at them until they meant nothing any more.