jatone @ jatone @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

1

Comments

563

Joined

9 mo. ago

dude that was a few months ago. =) they literally wasted 4 years. again. I'm pissed because my entire adult life the democrats have been worse than ineffectual at improving the american baseline. The republicans managed to take all 3 branches because of how piss poor democrats have been at representing their base. after harris' disgusting behavior on the campaign trail and biden absolute disgusting policies w/ respect to israel im basically done with the DNC at the national level, they can rot.

the democrats had plenty of time under biden to introduce bills regarding grocery prices. All I remember were finger wagging press releases and corporate give aways in funding.

Edit: yup, they did nothing effective

I think picking one domain for fact checking purposes is the best option just for clarity purposes. I could see using archival links as a general 'banned domains' approach worth considering in the future.

Yes. UDP relies on the IP protocols just as TCP does.

as I said stop wasting peoples time. troll elsewhere.

Dont think we need to make that distinction here. :) correct of course but ip vs i2p, tcp vs udp vs utp, etc are all different layers of the same domain.

Lol. Dont waste peoples time in the future thanks!

!! i was not aware of I2P. what a wonderful network.

fair enough!

TCP/IP isnt the only standard in use even today. UDP/IP is the other big one and there's a few smaller protocols hanging around like utp.

Plenty of ways to protect servers besides cloudflare people just refuse to set them up because of familiarity with cloud flare

thats kind of how it starts, individuals have different thresholds for migrating. its fine for it to take time. =)

Hardly, the leverage was always violence.

Lol looks at deleted comment. Oh man your salty and dont know shit about how vaccines work.

I didnt say they should/would sell it, just that they had options. The data collection is actually important, thats the hand waving your doing by dismissing it. it is literally a national security problem. you can extrapolate state secrets from mobile location data.

If they cared they could have regulated data collection across the board.

they did. they regulated limits on data collection for foreign adversaries. but again that'd require you read and comprehend the bill.

in no way have they limited speech or prevented people from speaking. the fact the oligarchs control the media is absolutely a problem, but tiktok ban wasnt about information dissemination, it was about information exfiltration.

so again what information has the US government banned americans from accessing? Im honestly curious, because I'd love to know what information i can't access.

lol, there absolutely is. you just dont partake in it. pray tell me what precisely am I prevented from doing on the internet in my US hellscape, that isnt illegal in general internet not withstanding, which you think should be allowed.

true! of course your hand waving why it was banned and the options they were given. tiktok could have divested from chinese control in the US region they chose not to. in no way has the US government censored information from individuals as a result of that bill. they censured the business operating procedures. two very different and distinct issues when it comes to access to content.

In no way have americans been prevented from accessing the information within tiktok. compare and contrast that with say trying to find tiananmen square information in china.

in fact i'll help everyone out, here is the ruling

uh obviously? do you not understand the distinction between corporate and government mandates? I can explain it if you need me to because its kind of critical to this whole conversation. and if you do understand the difference, then wtf is your point.

dunno what your talking about ive never been blocked by government mandate only corporate mandates, and I can just vpn around those.

ah sorry 8 days ago. ;) my point about self-pity was in reference to your original assertion about there not being realistic paths forward. didnt mean to imply anyone here was. point was that just because you dont consider a path realistic doesn't mean it isnt.

uh huh and what side of the fence is that? and what side am I on apparently? and who precisely is wallowing in self pity?

it’s a matter of ‘violence costs lives’ and you don’t change a system to one that you prefer and most other people don’t without organised and persistent violence

uh huh, and who are most people in this situation? because most people seem very fine with mr thompsons death. otherwise the media moguls wouldn't be spending their breath trying to tell people it wasnt okay.