I’m not certain where this is too “unpopular”. Personally, I’m not against it either, if they are (1) open source and (2) allow for users control/fine-tune as they please.
I think some of the concerns with the algorithmic feeds with Twitter/Facebook/… involve them being closed-source black box that optimizes for what companies want (engagement, clicks, …) without user’s actual consent, rather than what users want.
And being closed source also makes it hard for researchers and journalists to study/investigate the effects of these algorithms at scale. Being open source and transparent may help establish better understanding which algorithms are better/worse at the societal level. That informs users what to choose and developers on how to improve.
From my understanding, it’s probably multiple factors, including pushing users back to their app so they can track more and server more apps (3rd party apps usually block apps). Another is de-freeing the API access, which effectively kills many 3rd party apps in reddit case. The charge for API access is possibly very tied to the rise of data scraping demands for training AI models, and reddit has a lot of good content.
I’m not certain where this is too “unpopular”. Personally, I’m not against it either, if they are (1) open source and (2) allow for users control/fine-tune as they please.
I think some of the concerns with the algorithmic feeds with Twitter/Facebook/… involve them being closed-source black box that optimizes for what companies want (engagement, clicks, …) without user’s actual consent, rather than what users want.
And being closed source also makes it hard for researchers and journalists to study/investigate the effects of these algorithms at scale. Being open source and transparent may help establish better understanding which algorithms are better/worse at the societal level. That informs users what to choose and developers on how to improve.