I've never heard of Peri until this thread so I have no opinion of his motivations, but I do watch The 8-Bit Guy and I never got the impression that he was in it for the money. What makes you think that?
...the new Trump-appointed U.S. attorney offered an unusual plea deal...
...
But when U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli took office a few months later, federal prosecutors offered Kirk a plea deal — a dismissal of the felony if Kirk pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor, and a recommendation of one year of probation. A judge agreed to the lessened charge but sentenced Kirk to four months in prison on Monday.
Newsom should do more than that; he should order them to stand down and direct the California Bureau of Investigation, California Highway Patrol, or California State Guard to arrest any troops who fail to comply.
There is an implicit assumption here that models are being 'trained', perhaps because LLMs are a hot topic. By models we are usually talking about things like decision trees or regression models or Markov models that put in risk probabilities of various eventualities based on patient characteristics.
[Citation needed]
If these things were being based on traditional AI techniques instead of neural network techniques, why are they getting implemented now (when, as you say, LLMs are the hot topic) instead of a decade or so ago when that other stuff was in vogue?
I think the assumption that they're using training data is a very good one in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
I'd like to know what specific steps are being taken to remove the bias from the training data, then. You cannot just feed the model a big spreadsheet of human decisions up to this point because the current system is itself biased; all you'll get if you do that is a tool that's more consistent in applying the same systemic skew.
When by 1903 women in Britain had not been enfranchised, Pankhurst decided that women had to "do the work ourselves"; the WSPU motto became "deeds, not words". The suffragettes heckled politicians, tried to storm parliament, were attacked and sexually assaulted during battles with the police, chained themselves to railings, smashed windows, carried out a nationwide bombing and arson campaign...
the Salt Marches in India,
Why is India partitioned, then? (Hint: take a look at the Muslim League's tactics and goals.)
the Singing revolution in the Baltics
Kind of a special case; the USSR collapsed all by itself and didn't try to oppose them.
Nuclear weapons can exterminate a populace, but they cannot occupy, pacify, and rehabilitate one. For that, you need actual boots on the ground, which requires logistics. China could have the biggest military in the world, but that doesn't mean jack-shit unless they've got a blue-water navy to ship them over here, and they don't.
Remember, this discussion is not about China defeating the US. This discussion is about China liberating the US from the MAGAs the way the US liberated Germany from the Nazis. Nukes and drones are categorically useless for that purpose.
The civil rights movement succeeded because the authorities were made to realize that if they didn't play ball with MLK, folks like Malcolm X and Huey Newton were the alternative.
Thanks, that's the first explanation of the difference that's actually managed to reduce my confusion.