GreenM @ greenmarty @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

299

Joined

2 yr. ago

I have not disproved the part that say unknown percentage of miscarriages takes place. It's logical.

However if someone places exact number, it should be based on aomething. If the number has no base, as such it has no value l, at least for me.

As for second part about hatespeech accusations.
I don't see how statistics can blame someone for doing something wrong .
To me the logic is vise versa. If some demographic group is not doing so well or is doing very well. It will be reflected in statistics if measured. If given source stats can be compared and differences in measurement methods reduced or highlighted.

And new circle between adBlocks and antiAdDlocks begins.

So they are two nations who disagree with their totalitarian governments. Is that what you are implying given the OP saying People are not in agreement with their leaders actions?

Basically: On one side, there is government staying at power due to threat of US killing their own people?? and on the other side there's organization basically controlling government who is forced to stay at power under the threat of ... getting killed by the first side ? ... ehm... okay

My point -> How so their people don't give a damn if they are almost all against that?

I see so mothers of age 20-30yrs in Germany have same chance of miscarriage as 50-60 years olds North Korean mothers, that is 75%. Since evidently demographics doesn't matter.

Now seriously, why i asked that: No source stated. Every age, country etc has this ratio different. Some countries have problem due to late pregnancies (35+yrs) due their culture. Other have trouble because of malnutrition. Some have better conditions.

So before i take number as fact and start to spread it as such, i want to know it's a fact or at least narrow it down to the demographics and possibly the source.

Otherwise tomorrow there will be new expert say it's actually 1% or 99% and according to this logic we would have to update our knowledge every-time.

Please read this> my respond to some one else, It's also in this tread.

Please read this my respond to some one else basically saying the same as you, It's also in this tread.

Yeah i do. From where i come, if you leave drug addict on streets, they will continue their path of self-destruction regardless of their or others' well-being.
So most effective solution is to isolate the drug addict from the source of addiction.

That your prisons sucks at upholding basic human rights, it's not my fault. It's yours for not giving a damn about it.

There are places where prisoners get chance to work, own pet, study to become doctors, programmers and most importantly they get good healthcare as not everywhere around the globe people don't give a damn about people behind bars.

Also Locking her up doesn't inevitable mean in the prison. Again difference of my background i guess. There are specialized institutions that hold drug addicts and keeps them sober long enough to give them chance to get out of the habit. I know people who went through that. I've visited such a place. It might be a farm with animals or house kinda reminding of those for abused women (house with multiple affected who share their experiences and live together for limited time.

Your blinding rage just prevents you to see what's really wrong and what should be fixed.

To lock her the drug addict to protect fetus is good. To deny mto-be-mother proper conditions and medical care equals to endangering the fetus thus responsible people should be judged as such as well.

I don't think this to be religious question but rather legal question. Mother should sue the hell out of that prison and live from the half of the money ever after. But without drugs. Other half of the money should belong to the kid and used for kid's education etc.

Off topic but which country and what demographic ?

How did Izrali government or Hammas ended up in place of power without people's support? And why neither side seemed to mind on avg?

I've solved it by not buying good PC in adulthood.

Thx for making it shorter this time.

1. I do not spread lies I gave an example that should make it clear that people don't get right to become criminals because they were wronged in the past. You can replace babies with kids/ grandmas/ women etc.... Point stays.
2. I would probably try International humans right court, International war crimes court, ask for azyl in EU, Call UN for help, document and publicized wrongdoings, Emigrade,... Probably few more.... But i would not create terrorist cell, attack young people at peaceful music festival and murder families in their homes or kill daughter of one of the few Izreali who invest into Gaza and gives Palestinians work there.

Note: I'm against killing innocent people at any side of baricade but you seem to support the idea killing Jews . I wonder why.

bonus: I don't play to be Jedi since I left kindergarten, though I have to admit I miss it sometimes. Gotta rewatch original episodes sometime.

aren't strongmen just muscular dudes towing trucks on their back and lifting concrete balls?

and now it is 20/23

Sorry for not replying to every single point given. Due to the shear amount of text I hope it's understandable.

My point is that dispute of the past gives no one special right to be extra cruel. Once someone starts killing babies, it no longer matter if they or their grandparents had very difficult life. They are baby killers from that point on. It's never justified to take revenge on innocent people. Regardless of what side it is.

We are no in 1949 anymore, EU is helping Gaza for instance by humanitarian aid which they doubled these days. UN push against Izrael's order for northen Gaza. So going to international institutions as humans rights court or war crime court of even just documenting any wrong doing is much more effective at making situation better than butchering bunch of youngsters.

It's for international war court to judge and not some crazy butchers (Hamas) who punished wrong people anyway.
And if you are gonna imply it won't be just a) specifically killing kids as revenge is definitely not just, b) EU just doubbled their € budget that was already there to help Gaza . So not everyone is only supporting One side

I see. IMHO Biden seem to have lost respect because his health seems not top notch so it makes people doubt his mental health. If he wasn't falling or having trouble speaking occasionally, he would be less criticized.

Why bruttally murder whole families though ? Take them meat shields and retreat ASAP it gives higher success rate anyway. Why parade naked women body through the streets ? Nah their goal is to kill all Izraelis, anyone foreing loooking or anyone not taking part their religion.
I'm talking about Hamas not the ordinary Palestinians just to be clear.

I don't know (wo)man, somehow I can't image bunch of Ukrainians gliding into Moscow's music festival and youths facilities with aim of killing as many as possible as brutally as possible.
I would compare Hamas rather to Chechen back when Russia invaded them. And Russia killed their own people in at least two occasions when mass taken as hostages in that time.

Aren't presidents supposed to represent policy of their country though ? What's the point of head of the state that goes against it's policy ?