girsaysdoom @ girsaysdoom @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

172

Joined

2 yr. ago

Looking at the policy on the website here it looks like it's actually fairly reasonable. If you make less than x, are using a listed governmental assistance program, or qualify for the low-income isp plan then the cost is $30/month for 100Mbps Internet. The benefit that's listed in the article is the current subsidy that would remove the rest of the cost.

Does anyone know why they won't hear this case?

You're right, something like what I described wouldn't necessarily need networking to work like that. However, think if you had to manage 100 or more of these devices for people in an assembly plant. Deploying new torque specs to all of the workers' tools wirelessly would be much faster than having them bring them in individually after each batch job had been completed.

For efficiency and quality of service. If you have to tighten a hundreds of fasteners with specific amounts of torque then this would make the work go much more quicker than using a manual torque wrench.

This really isn't shocking news. Tons of industrial devices have poor or out of date security. This is why you always segment off your Operational Technology on your network.

Nah, what they described is more like SSO between websites.

So, what you're saying is... the law actually doesn't make sense. It should be that if they were a convicted felon, then that should be disclosed along with their old name. All of the other conditions here seem unnecessary unless we want to include name changes in general, which then they need to add a space on the actual form to include this.

I'm pretty sure they're taking about Xi.

True, Bernie got screwed and we're in a worse place for it. But if we knew the amount of damage that Trump would've caused I think a lot more people would've voted Democrat.

Good point!

Ooh or "gender = null"

Yeah, Johnny Craig definitely has an history of messed up stuff. It makes me glad I prefer Kurt Travis' vocals.

Aye.

Oh, yup. I definitely missed that one.

I think other people downvoting the comment above yours made it confusing.

For real. All I see is people blaming the victim.

I think you're proving their point even moreso. If there are less issues associated with drugs in this man's death then the police action was consequentially more of a factor.

How would you ban it?

There's a link within that article that would presumably go to the source of those numbers at "https://recycleutah.org/what-the-styrofoam/" but it seems like that article is broken on that site.

Not to doubt that those numbers are accurate (it's probably worse honestly), but the citation for that quote leads to a broken link on a Utah recycling site. It probably mostly goes to a landfill but they were probably saying that 30% of the total makeup of US landfills is EPS; not that only 30% of all EPS actually gets there.

It's simple: be intolerant to intolerance. Speech or actions that promote hate or violence against groups of people should honestly not be tolerated like it is. We need to call that shit out for the oppression that it is.