geekwithsoul @ geekwithsoul @piefed.social

I coalesce the vapors of human experience into a viable and meaningful comp

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

9

Joined

4 wk. ago

Have you ever heard the phrase "You can't reason someone out of an opinion that they didn't reason themselves into"? If they're objectively not fat, than what they're really saying is they feel like they're fat, not they they think that they're fat. That can be for a whole host of reasons, but arguing facts with them won't help. Far better to have discussions with them about why they feel that way and why they're focused on it. Ultimately it's an issue they have to resolve themselves and not something you can convince them of.

Such changes are called germ-line mutations because they occur in a cell used in reproduction (germ cell), giving the change a chance to become more numerous over time. If the mutation has a deleterious affect on the phenotype of the offspring, the mutation is referred to as a genetic disorder. Alternately, if the mutation has a positive affect on the fitness of the offspring, it is called an adaptation. [Nature]

I'm assuming you mean "mutation that gets passed down". Whether a mutation is a disorder or an adaptation takes generations to determine, so we may not know the identity of the individual. Furthermore, what was once a disorder may become adaptive in a different environment and vice versa. In general, I suppose if it was adaptive, they might be called "ancestor" :)

More broadly, and outside of germ-line mutations (meaning it's not passed down to offspring), everyone has cells with mutations. The person doesn't have the mutation per se, but a cell or cluster of cells do, so identifying them by that mutation doesn't make a lot of sense. If it's bad, your body either kills it or it kills you (e.g. cancer). If it's good, it likely doesn't change anything significantly.

What the hell is this horseshit… from the AP?! That's a Sunday magazine puff piece. It's made him "grateful" and "appreciative"? No, it's made him even more reckless and reactionary than he was in his first term.

Verizon's customer portal. Clunky, badly designed interface and what should be simple tasks end in dead pages, non-responsive widgets, and interminable loading screens. Just awful.

None of the age verification services respect privacy - that's baked into the whole push for it. Because it's not just about "verifying" people's ages at a specific point in time, especially in the US, it's about being able to prove you have in case anyone tries to sue you.

Was thinking it's either going to be food poisoning, completely unpalatable food combinations, or it'll all be a sham and they'll have their usual solution of immigrants doing all the actual work - and who are underpaid indentured servants and have had their passports confiscated.

Headlines like this really need to put the emphasis on the cause, e.g. "UK Government Forces Bluesky to Roll Out Age Verification"

Nothing for about the last two years - before that? All sorts of different things. But finally realized pretty much every game was either just trying to get me to cough up more money, was a subpar experience because of interface/hardware limitations, and/or weren't actually fun beyond giving me a brief distraction when I was bored.

If I get to the point where I want a mobile gaming option, I'll just get a Steam Deck. Honestly the less time I spend attached to my phone, the better.

Which still always amuses me, as horses originated in the Americas and lived there until about 12,000 years ago, went extinct there, and then got brought back by humans.