Almost there, but I take it. Don't you think that it's not the best things to impose rules on others based on feelings? Ever thought about other people feeling differently and their feelings being as valid as yours?
whether it be euthanasia
Like I said, christian compassion - let people suffer whether or not they want it. I know Jesus was into some kinky masochism, but the key was that he has chosen his suffering himself, he didn't chose suffering for others.
You don't say. But again, since you don't recognize basic errors in your logic and happen to be christian - I colloquially use the term christian fundamentalist.
Your argument is that killing people is bad (under most circumstances). When asked where you would put the line in human development, you name criteria like pain, heartbeat and visual similarity with fully developed human. But when asked about abortion you put the line at implantation, so a blastocyst, which is void of all the criteria you named yourself. That's rather inconsistent, wouldn't you agree?
Training data for models in general was a big problem when I studied systems biology. Interesting that we finding works around, since it sounded rather fundamental to me. I found your metaphor rather helpful, thanks.
I'm to lazy to search for the paper, not sure it was Microsoft, but with my rather basic knowledge of modeling (studied system biology) - it seemed rather crazy and impossible, so I remembered it.
Wasn't there a paper not long time ago that it was possible to generate data with AI as a training set for AI? I was surprised (and the math is to much for me to check out my self) but that seems to solve that problem.
For some reason, they refuse to admit they were mutilated without their consent.
I'm not sure that is exactly how they meant it, but I can see you interpret it that way. An unnecessary, irreversible medical operation was performed on you without your consent, but since you are not bothered by it - good for you.
Fair point, not sure somebody is doing it and if so why, but that would be indeed contra productive. If someone does not feel traumatized why would anyone would want to convince them otherwise?
This person, despite their stance on abortion, seems at least fairly progressive on their stance on trans people.
Maybe I missed something, if so, I'm really sorry - but so far this person was against direct physical violence against trans people, which is sure better than nothing, but also nothing really to pat someone on the back for.
This habit of individual members of a faith getting shoved on the back foot having to defend all of Christianity simultaneously for beliefs they don’t personally hold is a way to express your distaste of organized religion…
Again, I don't believe I'm doing it - I refer to this persons personal believes and I would be pleasantly surprised to be wrong.
Almost there, but I take it. Don't you think that it's not the best things to impose rules on others based on feelings? Ever thought about other people feeling differently and their feelings being as valid as yours?
Like I said, christian compassion - let people suffer whether or not they want it. I know Jesus was into some kinky masochism, but the key was that he has chosen his suffering himself, he didn't chose suffering for others.