Another thing a server can easily access is the timestamp of messages. Even if that is somehow stored encrypted in the server, messages are sent in real time and the server can easily log those, so an e2e encryption chat service will at the very least have logs with IP and timestamps. This can't really be avoided.
I've read plenty cricism of the US, China, Russia, Mexico and some of canada, Ukraine, France, Spain, Germany, Denmark, Norway, India, Australia, Taiwan, Japan, Brazil, Venezuela. Those I can think on top of my head.
If you don't see any hatred against anything besides the US, without trying to be too disrespectful, open your eyes.
I also hate bigots, it's just that engaging in hate against non-bigots to go against bigots is unnecessary when there's tons of other ways to go against bigots.
I never said "don't insult the bigot pro alpha asshole". Please do, but please don't kink shame <3
If he is seen in a public event while his account is gaming (easily trackable because anyone can add him to friends and then check where he is if he is online, if the account is changing zones while he is going a public speech...). Then users can report him and if GGG doesn't want to lose all their playerbase goodwill (they live through donations, so, bad idea) they will have to ban him.
Players in the subreddit are documenting a lot of proof that it's a Chinese player he is account sharing with.
That account sharing is bannable is not unknown, several streamers have had subathons this December and to help with the stream they asked family members to play instead, as a prwcautipn they asked GGG about this and GGG was pretty strict so family members created their own accounts and all. So, now they can't really backteack on it.
I've supported the game quite a lot in the past, if Elon isn't banned they can get ready to forget my future money forever.
When a human creates art, there is some intent on it, some emotions they felt when they decided the color pallete, the form... The fact that someone created it and that there's some story behind it gives the piece weight.
Why is an abstract monument created by humans something other humans like to see, and doesn't happen the same on a landslide? Because there's a story behind it.
AI art is lifeless because there's no intent behind it, you don't appreciate the skill of the author behind it. It's just prompt mastery and anyone can replicate it, it's cheap.
It's like comparing human made sculptures with 3d printed sculptures, if 3d printers could create details and work in big sizes. It's cheap.
About your first point: think of it like inbreeding, you need fresh genes on the pool or mutations occur.
A generative model will generate some relevant results and some non relevant results, it's the job of humans to curate that.
However, the more content the llm generates, it is used on the web and thus becomes part of it's training data.
Imagine that 95% of results are accurate, from those only 1% doesn't get fact checked and gets released into the internet where other humans will complain, but that will be used as input of an llm regardless. Anyway, so we have a 99% accuracy in the next input, and only 95% of that will be accurate.
It's literally a sequence that will reach very innacurate values very fast:
f(1) = 1
f(x_n) = x_n-1 * 0.95
You can mitigate it by not training it on generated data, but as long as AI content replaces genuine content, specially with images, AI will train itself from its own output and it will degenerate fast.
About the second point, you can pay artists to train models, sure, but that's not so clear when talking about text based generative models that depend on expert input to give relevant responses. About voice LLMs too, any given money would not be enough for a voice actor because doing so would effectively destroy their future jobs and thus future income.
Decent overpriced stuff of everything? That's Apple alright.