Well, it will end eventually. What the united states is doing right now is completely unsustainable long-term. I think it's going to get a lot worse for a lot of people for a long while, but it will end.
It seems that this is explicitly pushing prusa out of the open source model. Bambu is free to steal their innovations then add their own behind locked doors. The existence of companies like Bambu weighs us all down.
They took so much work that prusa put into the 3d printing world, and are then trying to lock it behind closed doors. I don't want to buy from a company who only exists from stifling innovation.
Clearly overblown. This isn't like a lethal or dangerous shock he used, some of the students in the class went on it for fun. The article says it's just enough to cause a tingling sensation. This whole thing was sent to the media by one parent throwing a tantrum.
A kids book owned by someone who is using the money and fame to campaign to destroy the lives of a bunch of my friends and millions of others.
You can like the book at whatever age idc, but please understand the sentiment that the author should not be getting revenue from those books because they are trying to legally define people out of existence. I'm not a fan of erasing media and, not having read the books, I have no way to be offended by their content, but I do not want Rowling profiting from their sale. Spread pirated digital copies in place of print until it ends up in public domain.
Okay but irrelevant ads is the dream. I'd prefer not to get recommendations at all either. I'll hear from word of mouth what's worthwhile to watch, or I'll look for it myself. Recommendations consistently muddy things up, it makes all modern social media useless, I have no idea how people can put up with it.
I don't know if there's a clean way to do this right now, but I'd love to see a software project dedicated to doing this. Once a data set is poisoned it becomes very difficult to un-poison. The companies would probably implement some semi-effective but heavy-handed means of defending against it if it actually affected them, but I'm all for making them pay for that arms race.
Probably not necessarily? Evolution does kind of a bad job at doing things that are beneficial, it just does things that half work some of the time, or does things at random that don't really hurt us, or does things at random that do hurt us but don't cause us to instantly drop dead as soon as we're born.
This feels to me like a thing that half works some of the time. Raw speculation here, but gasping could be to get a bit of oxygen to deal with a dangerous situation, but evolution equated danger with the unexpected so some of us just reflexively gasp when there's something unexpected. Or maybe it's something else, who knows.
Could be a tilt shift lens which can distort perspective and make a photo look as if it's being taken from a slightly different angle. Not sure what to look for to disprove that hypothesis though.
That sounds cool af! I wonder if something like that still exists.