what stops a member of the armed services from denying a command or order if it is unlawful? what about if it may be unlawful? (ie needs to be proven as such but “right now” just smells unlawful?)
no. that’s the thing - they only try using the teams interface to open docs not the actual app (ie word) and then opening a onedrive file. they’ll bitch that “teams doesn’t support x” and use the native app, save a file “whatever-v3.xlsx” and then email that file around while bitching things don’t work.
Because in their length of terms here they have grown into complacency and have forgotten to learn.
for me it’s how stupid they were to integrate onedrive into it so now I have old engineers saying “i put that file in teams” and they mean one drive in a “team” folder but they think it’s one big chat room.
as a person who’s wife is a very very mean drunk - like physically and emotionally - I just have been conditioned to think “those are the things she really thinks but hides. i am worthless and poor.”
i think “progressive” as a concept does not exist in either current US political party, in a manner that affects (effects?) meat-space reality. The reality is that both rep and dem parties are conservative in their own ways, the former is outward and forceful with it and the latter is hidden and corporate with it.
they both are regressive to the working class.
they both (in different ways) enable a fascist state to take hold, albeit at different rates of implementation.
edit: to add re my “right wing” remark - both parties in the US are right wing. Neither is “the left” even if dems seem to be “to the left” - they are both right of center.
yeah makes sense. i think after the drama from the massacres in vietnam they must have tried to pivot and change tactics in those regards.