fishos @ fishos @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

690

Joined

2 yr. ago

Something I didn't see mentioned: say you make a fake list, redacting the people you want to protect. What about the people you are now throwing under the bus? First your fake evidence has to make it past all of their lawyers scrutiny and hope you're not revealed for your con, and then you have to hope that these people don't have evidence that they can use to throw you under the bus as well. Releasing anyones name is likely to cause many more names to come out and the domino effect is way too unpredictable. It's truly some mutually assured destruction.

They still exist. You can grab a new one for free whenever. They only expire if you don't use them for ~6 months, and then you just ask for a new one.

Attention whore on an imaginary crusade. That's all you are. Should change your name to Don Quiote.

Bullshit. In another comment you literally complain about them posting comments(3 communist comments I think you said?) and not fixing this because in your words it should take less time to just fix it. You also say that their response(or lack of) to this specific post is interesting to you as proof of their inner motivations.

Furthermore, if you didn't want them to fix it, then tagging them is only to bully them.

You're so full of shit you can't even keep it straight since you posted this an hour ago.

Oh I abso-fucking-lutely can imagine seeing someone spamming me with DMs or making a public post to try and shame me instead of commenting on the actual source project going straight into my "ignore this twat" pile. This post is just a cry for attention. You're trying to be some sort of hero, saving us from evil or some shit.

Go make a GitHub request like a reasonable normal person and stop cluttering up others feeds with this inane bs.

Contact your doctor and ask to be tested for ADHD because holy shit you have this or something akin. Let me guess, you also cycle through hobbies constantly and have 100 projects you're "working on" right?

Here's a bit of advice: if you can't even remember what all the tabs have in them or which is which or what's important(which you constantly allude to when talking about searching through them).....NONE OF IT IS. It's the easiest ADHD clutter cleanup method: if you can't even remember that something specific exists and it's just a giant generic pile, it's all junk. If it really mattered, you'd have already sorted it or remembered it. Now it's just hanging around as emotional baggage.

Dump all of it and if any of it actually happens to have been important, you'll find it again if you really need it. If you don't find it again, then you didn't need it in the first place. And start using something to actually take notes and sort this shit. 2000+ tabs is insanity if this isn't a troll.

And that's all for analyzing statements. You can't just do that to some words and discover objective truth out of nowhere, so I'm not sure what you think you're accomplishing here. What you're linking is more analogous to the code that underlies an AI(if/while loops and whatnot). Reasoning is closer to the scientific method of forming a hypothesis and whatnot than anything you linked.

You basically just pointed out that there's a math system for logic. Neat.

I think for a third party to even exist viably, we need ranked choice voting. If Elon wants this party to actually exist, he needs RCV himself. Unless he's just planning to try and consume all of the moderate voters, which is a good bet too based on his ego, unfortunately.

I'm hoping the Dems split into a proper labor party as well

Yes, and without it, any third party struggles to take hold. This new party could make ranked choice voting a bipartisan(tripartisan?) issue since they would need it to survive unless they really think they can just yank all of the R votes their way.

The fact that you call Bernie "the fringe" and dismiss him, his recent rallys, the Philadelphia sanitation union strike, and so much more shows you just want to be defeatist and spout strawmen. I guess AOC doesn't exist either. So have fun being miserable I guess.

A new "Republican" party would necessarily have to argue for vote reform in order to make gains. We might be able to spin this into a bipartisan issue. We make it their own self interest to introduce ranked choice voting.

You act as if unions are non-existent and Bernie Sanders has no following.... Unlikely? Sure. But impossible? Nope. Literally half the Dem talk since the election has been about how much Dems feel disenfranchised by their own party. Have you been paying any attention?

Ok, call me crazy, but hear me out: this is good and we should encourage it.

One fascist party gets all the fascists aligned. Multiple fascist parties split them up. Suddenly their 51% majority is 25% and 26%. We should be fostering the infighting and splitting of the party. We should welcome its own destruction from within.

I'll only believe it when I see it, but this could theoretically be the beginning of the end for a two party system. If done right we could end up with 4 or 5 legitimate parties (including splitting Democrats up and getting a true labor party)

$10 says the "disproportional usage" is largely tied to them not "working" on the Sabbath and using disposable utensils as a loophole.

Yes, and I'm here criticizing "actually existing science". That's exactly my point. It's not "real science" when it's injected with politics and emotions like that. It's biased in a way science shouldn't be.

Wtf are you going on about? I'm talking about changing the name of a plant because it's discoverer was a racist. Nothing about politicians or pedophiles. Ffs, some of you have brain rot as bad as the MAGA. I'm literally saying that history should remain accurate and not try to whitewash away the negatives.

I think you're confusing "politics injected into science" with science. Science is data and analyzing it. Pretending someone didn't invent something is removing data points and I'm pretty sure science calls that fraud, just like we call the studies that found cigarettes healthy to be frauds, or the oil companies to be frauds. 2 wrongs don't make a right.

Remember, it's only "revisionist history" if it's the history you don't like. Otherwise it's "because totally valid reasons".

"unless you're a part of the community fuck you"

I can see why it got heated....