fallingcats @ fallingcats @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

0

Comments

335

Joined

2 yr. ago

Obviously you go and change the key instead?

If you also want to remove line breaks, paste it into a url bar

But that's not one road but multiple

I think they just made a release without it (for EU or stuff) and either forgot to turn in back on for regular releases, or it didn't because of a bug.

That should be more than enough ram for your quad-core cpu

No I just tried it and I was wrong, it seems like it doesn't matter for the ID matrix specifically

Wouldn't you need to put anyMatrix first, since matrix multiplication isn't commutative?

What alt text? I'm not seeing it (jeroba)

Is it not tested regularly?

Huh, seems you're right. I was under the impression this wouldn't work in dash but apparently that's wrong.

Yeah but you'd need to do it for everything that's affected, which is a lot.

The problem is that the all those apps installed as dependencies will get marked as unused and removed with the next --autoremove (which you should probably do regularly to clean up old kernels.

The real fix would be to mark all those apps as explicitly installed, but I don't use apt-based distros regularly so idk how.

Distrobox would like a word, or so I've heard. Haven't had to use it yet, as the AUR has pretty much everything.

We're not talking about the religion though, we're talking about the man, Jesus. He existed, and the historically verifiable facts stand.

The man wouldn't even be historically notable if not for the religion. For all intents and purposes, he is the religion, the main cornerstone that set Christianity apart from Judaism.

And I'm not sure what you mean by "the religion."

The subset of Christian denominations for which the statements make sense.

This one? https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=red+hat+cult

I really don't get it.

The most important claims about him are obviously the supernatural ones. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" and all. Everything about the religion hinges on them being true.

What do you have against redhat.com?

Well it's "just" a name. Obviously people going by that name are bonds to have existed. But arguing that "He" existed while at the same time saying most things about "Him" are false doesn't really have any meaning. It's not the same person as described in writing, when most descriptions don't apply.

Thats sounds a lot like C, in bash you cans also do for item in list; do echo $item; done

But, but like ... hear me out.

echo $((1+1))