evasive_chimpanzee @ evasive_chimpanzee @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

523

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think most jus soli countries also have jus sanguinis

This is especially weird because the Netherlands does not normally permit dual citizenship.

It seems like many (most?) countries don't like/recognize dual citizenship. The way it ends up working is that each country doesn't have the power to tell the other country that someone isn't a citizen. Each country just enforces it's own citizenship within it's borders. If you had US/Netherlands citizenship, and use a Dutch passport to try to enter the US, you will probably get yelled at by customs if they realize that you are a US citizen. They can't stop you from entering the US but they can hold you for a while and pester you.

If you have a US citizenship but live in another country, most of your income will be exempt from US taxes (unless you are a millionaire, in which case you probably aren't paying many taxes anyway).

A similar thing happens with countries that have mandatory military or civil service; you can be required to travel back to serve.

Lots of cars lots of traffic stopped cars radiators don't cool cars break down roads blocked

You essentially gamble a little bit. Most people get insurance through work (or they are part of a family plan). Generally, you'll have a few plans to choose from. If you are older, or have recurring issues, you might pick a plan that's a little more expensive, but covers more costs. If you are young and healthy, you might pick a cheap plan, essentially betting that you won't really need healthcare other than your yearly checkup and some vaccines.

The biggest thing with healthcare in the US is that it's very complex. Even if you have insurance that should cover something, it can be hard to find a doctor that's part of your insurance, so people often put off going to the doctor, which is part of the reason why costs are high. Teeth and eyes have separate insurance cause they are optional, apparently.

You basically have "premiums" that are your monthly payment. If you get your insurance through work, they cover a percentage of that; generally a pretty hefty amount of it. They usually don't outright tell you what percentage, though, so many people think insurance is cheap, and get a rude awakening when they lose a job, and suddenly can't afford $1000 a month when they used to be paying $100. Those premiums are taken out of your paycheck pre-tax, too, which gives you even more of a benefit if you have a job.

Depending on the "style" of the plans, they cover things differently. They all (I think) cover "preventative care" completely, which includes your yearly checkup, vaccines, and birth control for women. After that, some plans have "co-pays", which are set costs for a few things, like $25 for a normal doctors visit, $50 for a specialist, $100 for an emergency room visit. Some just cover a percentage of those costs, and some don't pay anything until you hit a limit (the deductible). Finally, there's an "out of pocket" limit. That's most you'll have to pay in a year, after which point the insurance covers everything.

All together, I pay less than $1000 a year for healthcare, but if I got really sick, and needed a bunch of expensive healthcare, I would quickly hit my out of pocket maximum, which I think is like $6,000. I could cover that, but many people cannot cover an expense like that on short notice.

The number on bills is very misleading. The hospitals know that insurance will negotiate down, so they start high, and then after the negotiations, insurance will pay some or all of the remainder. If you don't have insurance, you typically don't pay that whole number on the bill, either, cause the hospitals recognize that they dont have to adjust it up for the negotiation. You can still negotiate on your own, though.

In my experience, "joined up" is the British English way of referring to the mostly informal way that people write "joining up" their letters. I don't think it's as formally structured and taught like it is (was?) in America, where pretty much every letter is different than in print.

Peppers are a north/south American thing, there aren't any native to the old world, so it has to be a coincidence.

I just read into it a little bit. Seems that I was wrong, and "tar paper" is typically not completely waterproof, it's just water resistant. Most stuff these days isn't technically tar paper, either, it's roofing felt. I guess it's only called paper if it's made from cellulose. Apparently they did make the felt from asbestos back in the day.

Seems like it's definitely common enough to use it under flooring, especially if it's a thinner grade.

I haven't heard of tar paper being used as underlayment, but I have used big rolls of paper for that. In my understanding, the point for the paper is to allow the wood to be able to move seasonally, and to prevent squeaking.

I don't think I'd want to use tar paper, though, cause it's hydrophobic. Whatever finish is going on the wood is going to also be a water barrier, and it's a general rule of thumb to never have 2 water barriers next to each other in a house. That's how you get trapped water that can damage stuff. If you spill water, and it makes it in a little gap between floorboards, it could just sit there indefinitely.

I could be wrong, though.

There are a lot of problems with it. Lots of people could probably tell you about security concerns and wasted energy. Also there's the whole comically silly concept of them marketing having AI write your texts and emails for you, and then having it summarize the texts and emails you get. Just needlessly complicating things.

Conceptually, though, most people aren't too against it. In my opinion, all the stuff they are labeling "generative AI" isn't really "AI" or "generative". There are lots of ways that people define AI, and without being too pedantic about definitions, the main reason I think they call it that, other than marketing, is that they are really trying to sway public opinion by controlling language. Scraping all sorts of copywritten material, and re-jumbling it to spit out something similar, is arguably something we should prohibit as copyright infringement. It's enough of a gray area to get away with short term. By convincing people with the very language they use to describe it that they aren't just putting other people's material in a mixer, they are "generating new content", they hope to have us roll over and sign off on what they've been doing.

Saying that humans create stories by jumbling together previous stories is a BS cop out, too. Obviously, we do, but humans have not, and do not have to give computers that same right. Also, LLMs are very complex, but they are also way way less complex than human minds. The way they put together text is closer to running a story through Google translate 10 times than it is to a human using a story for inspiration.

There are real, definite benefits of using LLMs, but selling it as AI and trying to force it into everything is a gimmick.

Normally, they try to talk you into overshooting your AC needs, so you end up with a house that's the right temperature, but too humid. Strange that they undersold.

I get the sense that across the board, hvac people literally just glance at a house and proclaim the size of system you need. There's all sorts of calculators online where you can put in all the relevant info, and it will calculate your needs accordingly, but they just ignore that.

The problem I have with that is the same problem I have with the way people talk about most colonizer-colonizee(?) relationships. In many cases, you don't have the big bad powerful people going in and doing violence against natives. The powerful sit at home, and force their local poor into a position where they have to do violence in order to survive. Yeah, you had your Christopher Columbus types, but they weren't/aren't the majority.

Odds are, those loggers are members of another local tribe, who have been economically forced into illegal logging. Logging is super dangerous, and there's no way that the people actually responsible, who are the ones making real money off of it, are out there with chainsaws.

Tl;dr, they need glocks and bus tickets

It definitely comes and goes in waves, I think. The interplay between infrastructure and economy is key. Your economy is dependent on things like ports, rails, pipelines, cables, roads, powerstations, etc. A country can't continually overhaul those things, and once they've invested in them, they are stuck for a while. This leads to weird situations where one country that's been behind for a little while can pass another country.

The US electrified first, and when Europe electrified, it used higher voltage, which allowed for more efficient home electrification, while many Americans are stuck with slow kettles, and clothes dryers, water heaters, furnaces, and stoves that run on fossil fuels. Similarly, widespread internet rolled out in the US first, but countries that came later were able to get higher speeds.

The economy of most countries, especially the US and China, is a house of cards. While there may be more investment, there's also more risk, and more inequality. Germany may be more stagnant, but it also may be more stable. It doesn't matter if the GDP per capita is higher in the US than Germany if the average person has no healthcare, paid for schooling, or social safety net.

One of the biggest lies (maybe more of a "spin" than a lie) that has been told over the past century is that the "economy" is the stock market, gdp, net import/exports, commodities, etc. Those are all important, and economists like to use them cause they are easier than getting to what really matters to most people.

Making the panels high enough off the ground with sparse enough supports to be convenient adds a lot of expense. I mainly see it in paid parking lots where the shade can be sold as a value add.

Basically, from my understanding, the idea was that it wasn't a defense in the sense of the person saying they were innocent. The defense was in claiming that an assult/murder was not premeditated, hence the "panic".

I was thinking about potential for inaccuracy due to refraction from thermal inversion layers or other temperature anomalies, but then I realized that the refraction would equally affect the optics, provided that the optics remain on target throughout the firing.

I guess coconut milk would work. For dairy milk though unsweetened≠sugar free. Looks like there are plenty of unsweetened condensed milks, but I don't see any that are sugar free. Gotta get rid of the lactose for that.

I think the key that they never admit is that none of those disposable razors can really handle anything more than a couple of days growth. If you are someone who doesn't try to stay cleanshaven, but just want to shave once you start to get scruffy, it will never work.

That's where double edge, shavettes, and true straight razors excel.

It used to be cheaper. Nowadays you'll spend the same amount of money at McDonald's as the pub.

For some companies, I wish they didn't name it "criticisms" or "controversies"; it could literally just be "crimes". Like Chiquita fruit funding death squads isn't really controversial. Same thing with child slavery for chocolate companies.

The defining feature of Vietnamese coffee is sweetened, condensed milk. Personally I don't think I've seen sugar-free condensed milk. Not sure how you could make it.